ArticleScientific reports2024
Utilizing machine learning and molecular dynamics for enhanced drug delivery in nanoparticle systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced nanocatalytic medicine for genitourinary diseases: Reactive oxygen modulation, precision therapeutics, and clinical translation.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Review
- Comprehensive overview of AI methodologies in nano-drug delivery Optimization and Design.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Review
- Comparative analysis of supervised machine learning algorithms for transdermal drug delivery in brain disorders.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Article
- Polymer-stabilized amorphous CuO-ZnO hybrid nanocomplex as a promising candidate for antimicrobial therapy and controlled drug delivery with molecular docking insights.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted design and optimization of stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for smart drug delivery.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Molecular dynamics investigation of temozolomide encapsulation and controlled release from PLGA carriers.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Functional Reclassification of Lipid-Based Drug Delivery Systems and Advances in Formulation Strategies and Manufacturing Challenges.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2026Review
- Interfacial Interactions of Nanoparticles and Molecular Nanostructures with Model Membrane Systems: Mechanisms, Methods, and Applications.Membranes · 2026Review
- AI-driven nanomedicine for cancer theranostics.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Toward oral nanomaterial-based drug delivery systems for hepatocellular carcinoma therapy: evidence mapping, route-specific validation, and translational challenges.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in the Design and Development of Nanoparticle Drug Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review.Advances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2026Review
- Precision Nanomedicine for Renal Tubular Injury: From Passive Accumulation to Subcellular Targeting.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Molecular Simulations of Polymer-based Drug Nanocarriers: From Physical and Structural Properties to Controlled Release.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Nanomaterials in Drug Delivery: Leveraging Artificial Intelligence and Big Data for Predictive Design.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Harnessing smart nanomaterials to reprogram neutrophil plasticity in immune modulation.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- The Use of Computational Approaches to Design Nanodelivery Systems.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Nano-oncology revisited: Insights on precise therapeutic advances and challenges in tumor.Fundamental research · 2025Review
- Utilizing machine learning to predict MRI signal outputs from iron oxide nanoparticles through the PSLG algorithm.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Machine learning enabled multiscale model for nanoparticle margination and physiology based pharmacokinetics.Computers & chemical engineering · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Materials data science and machine learning (ML) are pivotal in advancing cancer treatment strategies beyond traditional methods like chemotherapy. Nanotherapeutics, which merge nanotechnology with targeted drug delivery, exemplify this advancement by offering improved precision and reduced side effects in cancer therapy. The development of these nanotherapeutic agents depends critically on understanding nanoparticle (NP) properties and their biological interactions, often analyzed through molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. This study enhances these analyses by integrating ML with MD simulations, significantly improving both prediction accuracy and computational efficiency. We introduce a comprehensive three-stage methodology for predicting the solvent-accessible surface area (SASA) of NPs, which is crucial for their therapeutic efficacy. The process involves training an ML model to forecast the many-body tensor representation (MBTR) for future time steps, applying data augmentation to increase dataset realism, and refining the SASA predictor with both augmented and original data. Results demonstrate that our methodology can predict SASA values 299 time steps ahead with a 40-fold speed improvement and a 25% accuracy increase over existing methods. Importantly, it provides a 300-fold increase in computational speed compared to traditional simulation techniques, offering substantial cost and time savings for nanotherapeutic research and development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.