ArticleScientific reports2024
The impact of novel hormonal agents on fracture risk in prostate cancer patients: a nationwide population-based cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence of osteoporosis and low bone mass in men with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Japanese cancer survivors have a higher risk of fragility fractures over ten years.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PC) treatment, particularly androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), remains pivotal, albeit linked to increased fracture risk due to osteoporosis. The advent of novel hormonal agents (NHAs) has spurred inquiries into their influence on bone health. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of NHAs on bone health in patients receiving combination therapy. We conducted a retrospective analysis using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, encompassing men aged 45 and above diagnosed with PC without bone metastasis and undergoing ADT between 2000 and 2018. The study involved 25,949 patients, categorized into those receiving standard ADT (n = 25,166) and those on NHA combination therapy (n = 783). Our analysis delved into fracture risk, comorbidities, and osteoporosis treatments. Patients on NHA combination therapy faced significantly higher risks of any osteoporotic fracture and major osteoporotic fracture than those on ADT alone (HR = 1.29, 95% CI 1.04-1.61; HR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.06-1.75, respectively). Notably, age emerged as a critical factor, with the highest risk observed in those aged 90 or above. The 5-year overall survival rates were lower for patients who experienced any osteoporotic fracture, major osteoporotic fracture, and hospitalization due to osteoporotic fracture compared to those who did not experience these fractures (51.5% vs. 56.5%, 47.1% vs. 56.7%, and 48.2% vs. 56.3%, respectively, p < 0.001). Furthermore, patients not using any bone-modifying agents had the highest risk for all fracture types. In conclusion, NHA combination therapy in PC patients potentially escalates the risk of osteoporotic fractures, especially in older individuals. Our findings underscore the pivotal role of osteoporosis treatments in preventing fractures, emphasizing the importance of evaluating fracture risk in patients undergoing NHA combination therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.