Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39496628›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Hybrid modeling approaches for agricultural commodity prices using CEEMDAN and time delay neural networks.

Pramit Pandit, Atish Sagar, Bikramjeet Ghose, Moumita Paul, Ozgur Kisi, Dinesh Kumar Vishwakarma, Lamjed Mansour, Krishna Kumar Yadav

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pramit PanditDepartment of Agricultural Statistics & Computer Application, Rabindra Nath Tagore Agriculture College, Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi, 834006, India.
Atish SagarDepartment of Agricultural Engineering, Rabindra Nath Tagore Agriculture College, Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi, 834006, India.
Bikramjeet GhoseDepartment of Agricultural Statistics, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, 741252, India.
Moumita PaulDepartment of Agricultural Statistics, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, 741252, India.
Ozgur KisiDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Applied Sciences, 23562, Lübeck, Germany. ozgur.kisi@th-luebeck.de.
Dinesh Kumar VishwakarmaDepartment of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, 263145, India. dinesh.vishwakarma4820@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2421-6995
Lamjed MansourDepartment of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11472, Saudi Arabia. lmansour@ksu.edu.sa.
Krishna Kumar YadavDepartment of Environmental Science, Parul Institute of Applied Sciences, Parul University, Vadodara, 391760, Gujarat, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improving the forecasting accuracy of agricultural commodity prices is critical for many stakeholders namely, farmers, traders, exporters, governments, and all other partners in the price channel, to evade risks and enable appropriate policy interventions. However, the traditional mono-scale smoothing techniques often fail to capture the non-stationary and non-linear features due to their multifarious structure. This study has proposed a CEEMDAN (Complete Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition with Adaptive Noise)-TDNN (Time Delay Neural Network) model for forecasting non-linear, non-stationary agricultural price series. This study has evaluated its suitability in comparison with the other three major EMD (Empirical Mode Decomposition) variants (EMD, Ensemble EMD and Complementary Ensemble EMD) and the benchmark (Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average, Non-linear Support Vector Regression, Gradient Boosting Machine, Random Forest and TDNN) models using monthly wholesale prices of major oilseed crops in India. Outcomes from this investigation reflect that the CEEMDAN-TDNN hybrid models have outperformed all other forecasting models on the basis of evaluation metrics under consideration. For the proposed model, an average improvement of RMSE (Root Mean Square Error), Relative RMSE and MAPE (Mean Absolute Percentage Error) values has been observed to be 20.04%, 19.94% and 27.80%, respectively over the other EMD variant-based counterparts and 57.66%, 48.37% and 62.37%, respectively over the other benchmark stochastic and machine learning models. The CEEMD-TDNN and CEEMDAN-TDNN models have demonstrated superior performance in predicting the directional changes of monthly price series compared to other models. Additionally, the accuracy of forecasts generated by all models has been assessed using the Diebold-Mariano test, the Friedman test, and the Taylor diagram. The results confirm that the proposed hybrid model has outperformed the alternative models, providing a distinct advantage.

Indexed as

Agriculture price forecastingEmpirical mode decompositionIntrinsic mode functionsNon-linearityTime delay neural network

Identifiers

PMID39496628
PMCPMC11535273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.