Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39496622›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Insights and caveats from mining local and global temporal motifs in cryptocurrency transaction networks.

Naomi A Arnold, Peijie Zhong, Cheick Tidiane Ba, Ben Steer, Raul Mondragon, Felix Cuadrado, Renaud Lambiotte, Richard G Clegg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Naomi A ArnoldNetwork Science Institute, Northeastern University London, London, E1W 1LP, UK. naomialicearnold@gmail.com.
Peijie ZhongSchool of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK.
Cheick Tidiane BaSchool of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK.
Ben SteerPometry Ltd, 69 Wilson St, London, EC2A 2BB, UK.
Raul MondragonSchool of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK.
Felix CuadradoSchool of Telecommunications Engineering, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, Av. Complutense, 30, Moncloa - Aravaca, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Renaud LambiottePometry Ltd, 69 Wilson St, London, EC2A 2BB, UK.
Richard G CleggSchool of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distributed ledger technologies have opened up a wealth of fine-grained transaction data from cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum. This allows research into problems like anomaly detection, anti-money laundering, pattern mining and activity clustering (where data from traditional currencies is rarely available). The formalism of temporal networks offers a natural way of representing this data and offers access to a wealth of metrics and models. However, the large scale of the data presents a challenge using standard graph analysis techniques. We use temporal motifs to analyse two Bitcoin datasets and one NFT dataset, using sequences of three transactions and up to three users. We show that the commonly used technique of simply counting temporal motifs over all users and all time can give misleading conclusions. Here we also study the motifs contributed by each user and discover that the motif distribution is heavy-tailed and that the key players have diverse motif signatures. We study the motifs that occur in different time periods and find events and anomalous activity that cannot be seen just by a count on the whole dataset. Studying motif completion time reveals dynamics driven by human behaviour as well as algorithmic behaviour.

Identifiers

PMID39496622
PMCPMC11535018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.