Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39496589›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Reward recalibrates rule representations in human amygdala and hippocampus intracranial recordings.

Luis Manssuer, Qiong Ding, Yashu Feng, Ruoqi Yang, Wei Liu, Bomin Sun, Shikun Zhan, Valerie Voon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Contributions of the basolateral amygdala and nucleus accumbens to sustaining not just initiating cognitive effort.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Luis ManssuerDepartment of Neurosurgery, RuiJin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. lrm48@cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0009-0003-9853-312X
Qiong DingDepartment of Psychiatry, Addenbrookes Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5157-3659
Yashu FengNeural and Intelligence Engineering Center, Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Ruoqi YangNeural and Intelligence Engineering Center, Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4938-3367
Wei LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, RuiJin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Bomin SunDepartment of Neurosurgery, RuiJin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shikun ZhanDepartment of Neurosurgery, RuiJin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. shikun_zhan@163.com.
Valerie VoonDepartment of Neurosurgery, RuiJin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. vv247@cam.ac.uk.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 81771482National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) T2250710686RCUK | MRC | Medical Research Foundation MR/W020408/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adaptive behavior requires the ability to shift responding within (intra-dimensional) or between (extra-dimensional) stimulus dimensions when reward contingencies change. Studies of shifting in humans have focused mainly on the prefrontal cortex and/ or have been restricted to indirect measures of neural activity such as fMRI and lesions. Here, we demonstrate the importance of the amygdala and hippocampus by recording local field potentials directly from these regions intracranially in human epilepsy patients. Reward signals were coded in the high frequency gamma activity (HFG; 60-250 Hz) of both regions and synchronised via low frequency (3-5 Hz) phase-locking only after a shift when patients did not already know the rule and it signalled to stop shifting ("Win-Stay"). In contrast, HFG punishment signals were only seen in the amygdala when the rule then changed and it signalled to start shifting ("Lose-Shift"). During decision-making, hippocampal HFG was more inhibited on non-shift relative to shift trials, suggesting a role in preventing interference in rule representation and amygdala HFG was sensitive to stimulus novelty. The findings expand our understanding of human amygdala-hippocampal function and shifting processes, the disruption of which could contribute to shifting deficits in neuropsychiatric disorders.

Indexed as

AmygdalaEpilepsyHippocampusRewardAdultDecision MakingElectrocorticographyFemaleGamma RhythmHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39496589
PMCPMC11535001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.