Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39496464›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry2025

Apheresis therapies in MOGAD: a retrospective study of 117 therapeutic interventions in 571 attacks.

Carolin Schwake, Theodoros Ladopoulos, Vivien Häußler, Ingo Kleiter, Marius Ringelstein, Orhan Aktas, Tania Kümpfel, Daniel Engels, Joachim Havla, Martin W Hümmert and 29 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Induction of immune tolerance in NMOSD and MOGAD.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

39 authors.

Carolin SchwakeDepartment of Neurology, St Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3669-7244
Theodoros LadopoulosDepartment of Neurology, St Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Vivien HäußlerNeurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7787-7391
Ingo KleiterBehandlungszentrum Kempfenhausen für Multiple Sklerose Kranke gemeinnützige, Berg, Germany.
Marius RingelsteinDepartment of Neurology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3618-8407
Orhan AktasDepartment of Neurology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Tania KümpfelInstitute of Clinical Neuroimmunology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7509-5268
Daniel EngelsInstitute of Clinical Neuroimmunology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9877-6987
Joachim HavlaInstitute of Clinical Neuroimmunology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4386-1340
Martin W HümmertDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5928-2343
Julian Reza KretschmerDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Daria TkachenkoDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Corinna TrebstDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Ana Beatriz Ayroza Galvão Ribeiro GomesDepartments of Neurology, Biomedicine and Clinical Research and Research Center for Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Anne-Katrin PröbstelDepartments of Neurology, Biomedicine and Clinical Research and Research Center for Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Mirjam Korporal-KuhnkeMolecular Neuroimmunology Group, Department of Neurology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Brigitte WildemannMolecular Neuroimmunology Group, Department of Neurology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sven JariusMolecular Neuroimmunology Group, Department of Neurology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Refik PulDepartment of Neurology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.
Mosche PompschDepartment of Neurology, Alfried Krupp Hospital Rüttenscheid, Essen, Germany.
Markus KrämerDepartment of Neurology, Alfried Krupp Hospital Rüttenscheid, Essen, Germany.
Florian Then BerghDepartment of Neurology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Clemens GödelDepartment of Neurology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Patricia SchwarzDepartment of Neurology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Markus C KowarikDepartment of Neurology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Paulus Stefan RommerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5209-6647
Ioannis VardakasDepartment of Neurology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Makbule SenelDepartment of Neurology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2737-7495
Alexander WinkelmannDepartment of Neurology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Nele RetzlaffDepartment of Neurology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Martin S WeberFraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology (ITMP), Göttingen, Germany.
Leila HusseiniDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Annette WalterDepartment of Neurology, Herford Hospital, Herford, Germany.
Patrick SchindlerExperimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbruck Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Judith Bellmann-StroblExperimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbruck Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Friedemann PaulExperimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbruck Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Ralf GoldDepartment of Neurology, St Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Ilya AyzenbergDepartment of Neurology, St Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany ilya.ayzenberg@rub.de.
Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncomplete attack remission is the main cause of disability in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD). Apheresis therapies such as plasma exchange and immunoadsorption are widely used in neuroimmunology. Data on apheresis outcomes in MOGAD attacks remain limited.

methodsWe retrospectively evaluated all apheresis treated attacks occurring in patients with MOGAD between 2008 and 2023 at 18 Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group centres. Treatment response was categorised as complete, partial or no remission. Preattack and follow-up Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and visual Functional System Scores (FSS) were used to calculate absolute outcomes (ΔEDSS/Δvisual FSS). Predictors of complete remission were analysed using a generalised linear mixed model.

resultsApheresis was used for 117/571 (20.5%) attacks in 85/209 (40.7%) patients. Attacks with simultaneous optic neuritis and myelitis were treated more often with apheresis (42.4%, n=14) than isolated myelitis (25.2%, n=35), cerebral manifestation (21.0%, n=17) or isolated optic neuritis (17.6%, n=51). Apheresis was initiated as first-line therapy in 12% (4.5 (IQR 0-11) days after attack onset), second-line therapy in 62% (15 (IQR 6.75-31) days) and third-line therapy in 26% (30 (IQR 19-42) days). Complete remission was achieved in 21%, partial remission in 70% and no remission in 9% of patients. First-line apheresis (OR 2.5, p=0.040) and concomitant disease-modifying therapy (OR 1.5, p=0.011) were associated with complete remission. Both parameters were also associated with a favourable ΔEDSS. No differences in outcomes were observed between the apheresis types.

conclusionApheresis is frequently used in MOGAD attacks. An early start as first-line therapy and concomitant disease-modifying therapy predict full attack recovery.

Indexed as

Blood Component RemovalMyelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody-Associated DiseaseNeuromyelitis OpticaAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyelitisOptic NeuritisPlasma ExchangeRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultClinical NeurologyNeuroimmunology

Identifiers

PMID39496464
PMCPMC12322437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.