ArticleBMJ global health2024
From curriculum to clinic: a qualitative study of junior doctors' perceptions of global health and sustainable development.
Article in BMJ global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Learning planetary health through international & interprofessional education: a qualitative study of student reflections.Medical education online · 2026Article
- Planetary health and environmentally sustainable healthcare: perceptions of primary care practitioners in Ireland - a qualitative study.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe role of global health and sustainable development in medical education is often debated. However, research regarding medical doctors' views on the application of their global health knowledge in the clinical setting remains scarce. This study aimed to explore junior doctors' perceptions of global health and sustainable development, the education they have received on these issues and the relevance of this knowledge in their current and future work.
methodsThis was a qualitative study based on individual interviews conducted between May and June 2022. 16 junior doctors, in mandatory clinical training after completing medical school, were purposively sampled from five Swedish hospitals. Transcripts were analysed using qualitative content analysis.
resultsThree themes were identified. The first theme (1) 'medical doctors have a role in the transition to a sustainable society', shows that sustainable development is increasingly perceived as relevant for junior doctors' clinical work. The second theme (2) 'global health and sustainable development teaching is inconsistent and somewhat outdated', highlights that there is an assumption that global health and sustainable development can be self-taught. A discrepancy between what is being taught in medical school and the clinical reality is also recognised. This causes challenges in applying global health interest and knowledge in the clinical setting, which is described in the third theme (3) 'application of global health and sustainable development is difficult'. This theme also highlights opportunities for continued engagement, with the perceived benefit of becoming a more versatile doctor.
conclusionThis study emphasises the need for conceptual clarity regarding global health in medical education and raises the need for clarification regarding the level of responsibility for integrating sustainable practices in Swedish healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.