Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39496360›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2024

Benefit equity of social health insurance in China and its provinces (2014-2020): implications for universal health coverage.

Yaoyun Zhang, Anne Mills, Jin Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yaoyun ZhangSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1090-0008
Anne MillsDepartment of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Jin XuChina Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China xujin@hsc.pku.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6364-0887

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChina has increased fiscal input into social health insurance (SHI) schemes to achieve universal health coverage. Our study aimed to examine the equity of SHI benefits in the country and five representative provinces over the period of 2014-2020.

methodsWe analysed nationally and subnationally representative data from four waves (2014, 2016, 2018 and 2020) of the China Family Panel Studies. Benefit relative to consumption was assessed using concentration indices and concentration curves. We compared benefit distribution against health need across consumption quintiles. We further decomposed the change in the concentration index from 2014 to 2020.

resultsThe national concentration index for SHI benefit was pro-rich but became substantially less so over time, falling from 0.262 in 2014 to 0.133 in 2020. Poorer quintiles suffered more ill health but received a smaller share of SHI benefits compared with the richer quintiles. All five provinces improved in benefit equity to varying degrees. Reduced disparity between employee and resident schemes, and use of hospitals as the usual source of care, accounted for 44.47% and 14.70%, respectively, of the national improvement in SHI benefit equity.

conclusionThe benefit equity of SHI in China has improved, likely influenced by the narrowing funding gap between resident and employee scheme benefits. However, benefits remained skewed towards the richer groups with lower health need, revealing the resilience of an 'Inverse Benefit Law'. We suggest risk-equalisation of SHI funds and coordinated reform in health financing and service delivery towards a greater focus on primary care.

Indexed as

Universal Health InsuranceChinaHumansInsurance, HealthHealth economicsHealth insuranceHealth services researchHealth systems

Identifiers

PMID39496360
PMCPMC11535667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.