ArticleInternational archives of allergy and immunology2025
Comparing Two Peanut Desensitization Protocols in Preschool Children: A Real-World Clinical Practice.
Article in International archives of allergy and immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Eosinophilic Esophagitis following Oral Immunotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International archives of allergy and immunology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPeanut allergy is the main food allergy in childhood and poses significant health concerns. This study aimed to critically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of oral immune therapy (OIT) using crushed peanuts versus peanut puffs.
methodsChildren with an allergist diagnosed peanut allergy based on a history of an IgE-mediated reaction and a positive skin prick test for peanuts were recruited at the Montreal Children's Hospital and the Children's Clinic located in Montreal. Based on age and personal preference, initial doses of peanut were given in either puff (Bamba) or crushed peanut form. Patients continued the same dose for 2-5 weeks at home, filled out a symptom diary, and returned to the clinic for up-dosing until maintenance was reached (2 teaspoons of peanut butter). A continuation ratio regression model was used to evaluate the effect of the allergen type on the severity of anaphylactic and allergic reactions (ARs) during OIT while adjusting for potential confounders.
resultsBetween October 2020 and June 2023, 191 children (59.6% male; median age 1.95 years) were recruited. Most patients (75.1%) had eczema, and 12.7% had asthma. Oral desensitization was performed using one of two strategies according to the allergist: crushed peanut (n = 60 [31.4%]) and peanut puff (n = 131 [68.6%]). Of the participants, the consumption of puff lowered reaction severity by a factor of 3.94 (95% CI, 1.6-9.6), in comparison to crushed peanuts. Older age markedly elevates the adjusted odds of reacting to a particular severity level as compared to a lower level by 1.20 (95% CI, 1-1.4).
conclusionModified peanut desensitization using peanut puffs has shown potential in reducing the severity of ARs in younger children. Older children may experience a higher risk of severe reactions, indicating the need for age-specific approaches to desensitization protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.