Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39496145›Full record

ReviewInteractive journal of medical research2024

Screening for Depression Using Natural Language Processing: Literature Review.

Bazen Gashaw Teferra, Alice Rueda, Hilary Pang, Richard Valenzano, Reza Samavi, Sridhar Krishnan, Venkat Bhat

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Interactive journal of medical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. AI in Medical Questionnaires: Scoping ReviewJournal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Detecting Patterns of Intimate Partner Violence Using Qualitative Analyses and Machine Learning Algorithms.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bazen Gashaw TeferraUnity Health Toronto, St. Michael's Hospital, Interventional Psychiatry Program, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5325-9639
Alice RuedaUnity Health Toronto, St. Michael's Hospital, Interventional Psychiatry Program, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9977-9653
Hilary PangUnity Health Toronto, St. Michael's Hospital, Interventional Psychiatry Program, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4016-6673
Richard ValenzanoToronto Metropolitan University, Department of Computer Science, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5954-7869
Reza SamaviToronto Metropolitan University, Department of Electrical, Computer, and Biomedical Engineering, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6768-0168
Sridhar KrishnanToronto Metropolitan University, Department of Electrical, Computer, and Biomedical Engineering, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4659-564X
Venkat BhatUnity Health Toronto, St. Michael's Hospital, Interventional Psychiatry Program, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8768-1173

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepression is a prevalent global mental health disorder with substantial individual and societal impact. Natural language processing (NLP), a branch of artificial intelligence, offers the potential for improving depression screening by extracting meaningful information from textual data, but there are challenges and ethical considerations.

objectiveThis literature review aims to explore existing NLP methods for detecting depression, discuss successes and limitations, address ethical concerns, and highlight potential biases.

methodsA literature search was conducted using Semantic Scholar, PubMed, and Google Scholar to identify studies on depression screening using NLP. Keywords included "depression screening," "depression detection," and "natural language processing." Studies were included if they discussed the application of NLP techniques for depression screening or detection. Studies were screened and selected for relevance, with data extracted and synthesized to identify common themes and gaps in the literature.

resultsNLP techniques, including sentiment analysis, linguistic markers, and deep learning models, offer practical tools for depression screening. Supervised and unsupervised machine learning models and large language models like transformers have demonstrated high accuracy in a variety of application domains. However, ethical concerns related to privacy, bias, interpretability, and lack of regulations to protect individuals arise. Furthermore, cultural and multilingual perspectives highlight the need for culturally sensitive models.

conclusionsNLP presents opportunities to enhance depression detection, but considerable challenges persist. Ethical concerns must be addressed, governance guidance is needed to mitigate risks, and cross-cultural perspectives must be integrated. Future directions include improving interpretability, personalization, and increased collaboration with domain experts, such as data scientists and machine learning engineers. NLP's potential to enhance mental health care remains promising, depending on overcoming obstacles and continuing innovation.

Indexed as

cross-culturaldeep learningdepressionlarge language modelsmachine learningnatural language processingNLPRDoCresearch domain criteriasentiment analysistransformer-based models

Identifiers

PMID39496145
PMCPMC11574504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.