ArticleHealth affairs (Project Hope)2024
Perinatal Health Insurance And Health Care Use By Immigration Status In 6 US States, 2020-22.
Article in Health affairs (Project Hope), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- U.S. Immigration Policy Environment Contributions to Maternal and Child Health in the Latino Population.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Review
- New York's Basic Health Program Increased Subsidized Insurance Coverage From Preconception To The Postpartum Period.Health affairs (Project Hope) · 2025Article
- "To me, it was overwhelming": a mixed methods study of maternal healthcare in a marginalised community in New York City, guided by the person-centered care framework for reproductive health equity.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2025Article
- Public Coverage of Postpartum Services for Immigrants.JAMA health forum · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Some noncitizens in the US are not eligible for public health insurance, potentially reducing access to preconception, prenatal, and postpartum care. We compared insurance coverage and health care use from the preconception period to the postpartum period by immigration status, using representative survey data collected from six US states between 2020 and 2022. Respondents were surveyed at two to six months postpartum and at twelve to fourteen months postpartum. Immigration status was classified in three categories: US citizen, permanent resident, and people who were neither citizens nor permanent residents. Compared with US citizens, fewer permanent residents had late postpartum insurance coverage, but coverage rates were otherwise similar. Coverage was lower among noncitizens/non-permanent residents compared with US citizens at every time point except pregnancy, with the largest differences at preconception (50.5 percent and 90.5 percent, respectively) and late postpartum (53.2 percent and 95.1 percent, respectively). Fewer permanent residents had health care visits before pregnancy compared with US citizens, but health care use was otherwise similar. Noncitizens/non-permanent residents had substantially lower rates of preconception health care, early and adequate prenatal care, postpartum visits, and having a usual source of care at one year postpartum. Expansion of public insurance to cover immigrants is needed to reduce large inequities in perinatal health insurance and health care use by immigration status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.