ArticlePLOS global public health2024
An assessment of the content of antenatal care provided by obstetricians in Lebanon: A cross-sectional study.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bridging the Gaps: A Critical Review of National Dietary and Lifestyle Guidelines for Pregnant Women in the Eastern Mediterranean Region.Maternal and child health journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quality and timely antenatal care is a vital component of pregnancy care for the well-being of mothers and babies. The aim of this study of to assess self-reported obstetricians' adherence to national and international antenatal care guidelines in Lebanon. This cross-sectional study approached all obstetricians registered with the Lebanese Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Lebanese Order of Physicians to participate in an online and telephone-based survey. The study tool included all of the items from the World Health Organization and national guidelines for antenatal care. Obstetricians' self-reported adherence was assessed across five modules including dietary interventions, dietary supplements, antenatal care assessment, fetal growth assessment, and antenatal care preventive measures. A total of 134 obstetricians completed the survey. Overall, adherence was high for most antenatal care guidelines except for providing nutrition services to undernourished pregnant women, screening for intimate partner violence, and providing tetanus vaccines. The number of recommended antenatal care visits (≥8 vs. <8 visits) was higher among obstetricians in Mount Lebanon or Beirut compared to other areas in Lebanon (72.7%vs.48.6%; p-value <0.01). Provision of tetanus or diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (DTP) vaccination was lower for obstetricians who provide care for women who pay out-of-pocket compared to obstetricians who provide care to women who use other payment methods (25.3%vs.45.7%; p-value = 0.024). Group B streptococcus screening test and the provision of at least five ultrasounds were higher among obstetricians who provide care in private clinics or clinics in private hospitals compared to clinics in public hospitals or primary healthcare centers (88.8%vs.66.7%; p-value = 0.023) and (83.6%vs.55.6%; p-value = 0.011), respectively. Reinforcing the adherence to all antenatal care guidelines by continuous monitoring of health facilities is crucial for best practice. Subsidies for essential services may be required for those who are unable to afford components of antenatal care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.