Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39495736›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Cost effectiveness and return on investment analysis for surgical care in a conflict-affected region of Sudan.

C Phifer Nicholson, Anthony Saxton, Katherine Young, Emily R Smith, Mark G Shrime, Jon Fielder, Thomas Catena, Henry E Rice

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

C Phifer NicholsonDepartment of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Anthony SaxtonDepartment of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1203-8896
Katherine YoungMother of Mercy-Gidel Hospital, Gidel, Sudan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7757-7517
Emily R SmithDepartment of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Mark G ShrimeDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3546-9867
Jon FielderAfrican Mission Healthcare, Kenya, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7979-3133
Thomas CatenaMother of Mercy-Gidel Hospital, Gidel, Sudan.
Henry E RiceDepartment of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8033-6687

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The delivery of healthcare in conflict-affected regions places tremendous strains to health systems, and the economic value of surgical care in conflict settings remains poorly understood. Our aims were to evaluate the cost-effectiveness, societal economic benefits, and return on investment (ROI) for surgical care in a conflict-affected region in Sudan. We conducted a retrospective study of surgical care from January to December 2022 at the Mother of Mercy-Gidel Hospital (MMH) in the Nuba Mountains of Sudan, a semi-autonomous region characterized by chronic and cyclical conflict. We collected data on all patients undergoing surgical procedures (n = 3016), including age, condition, and procedure. We used the MMH budget and financial statements to measure direct medical and non-medical expenditures (costs) for care. We estimated the proportion of expenditures for surgical care through a survey of surgical vs non-surgical beds. The benefits of care were calculated as averted disability-adjusted life-years (DALYa) based on predicted outcomes for the most common 81% of procedures, and then extrapolated to the overall cohort. We calculated the average cost-effectiveness ratio (CER) of care. The societal economic benefits of surgical care were modeled using a human capital approach, and we performed a ROI analysis. Uncertainty was estimated using sensitivity analysis. We found that the CER for all surgical care was $72.54/DALYa. This CER is far less than the gross domestic product per capita in the comparator economy of South Sudan ($585), qualifying it as very cost-effective by World Health Organization standards. The total societal economic impact of surgical care was $9,124,686, yielding a greater than 14:1 ROI ratio. Sensitivity analysis confirmed confidence in all output models. Surgical care in this conflict-affected region of Sudan is very cost-effective, provides substantial societal economic benefits, and a high return on investment.

Identifiers

PMID39495736
PMCPMC11534226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.