ArticleGenetics2025
Megavariate methods capture complex genotype-by-environment interactions.
Article in Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A guide to plant breeding for animal breeders.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Review
- Strategic global data integration to improve genomic prediction accuracy in tree breeding programs facing resource limitations, a case study in mango.Horticulture research · 2026Article
- The next frontier for genomic prediction is computational.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- When does accounting for gene-environment interactions improve complex trait prediction? A case study with Drosophila lifespan.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Genomic prediction in a small barley population can benefit from training on related populations.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Monte Carlo approximation of the logarithm of the determinant of large matrices with applications for linear mixed models in quantitative genetics.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2025Article
- When does accounting for gene-environment interactions improve complex trait prediction? A case study withbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Biobanks in GENETICS and G3: tackling the statistical challenges.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Article
- MTMEGPS: An R package for multi-trait and multi-environment genomic and phenomic selection using deep learning.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic prediction models that capture genotype-by-environment (GxE) interaction are useful for predicting site-specific performance by leveraging information among related individuals and correlated environments, but implementing such models is computationally challenging. This study describes the algorithm of these scalable approaches, including 2 models with latent representations of GxE interactions, namely MegaLMM and MegaSEM, and an efficient multivariate mixed-model solver, namely Pseudo-expectation Gauss-Seidel (PEGS), fitting different covariance structures [unstructured, extended factor analytic (XFA), Heteroskedastic compound symmetry (HCS)]. Accuracy and runtime are benchmarked on simulated scenarios with varying numbers of genotypes and environments. MegaLMM and PEGS-based XFA and HCS models provided the highest accuracy under sparse testing with 100 testing environments. PEGS-based unstructured model was orders of magnitude faster than restricted maximum likelihood (REML) based multivariate genomic best linear unbiased predictions (GBLUP) while providing the same accuracy. MegaSEM provided the lowest runtime, fitting a model with 200 traits and 20,000 individuals in ∼5 min, and a model with 2,000 traits and 2,000 individuals in less than 3 min. With the genomes-to-fields data, the most accurate predictions were attained with the univariate model fitted across environments and by averaging environment-level genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) from models with HCS and XFA covariance structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.