Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39495659›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2025

Optimization of breeding program design through stochastic simulation with evolutionary algorithms.

Azadeh Hassanpour, Johannes Geibel, Henner Simianer, Antje Rohde, Torsten Pook

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Azadeh HassanpourDepartment of Animal Sciences, Animal Breeding and Genetics Group, University of Goettingen, Albrecht-Thaer-Weg 3, Goettingen 37075, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1976-3457
Johannes GeibelDepartment of Animal Sciences, Animal Breeding and Genetics Group, University of Goettingen, Albrecht-Thaer-Weg 3, Goettingen 37075, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7172-3263
Henner SimianerDepartment of Animal Sciences, Animal Breeding and Genetics Group, University of Goettingen, Albrecht-Thaer-Weg 3, Goettingen 37075, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7551-3797
Antje RohdeCoordination Center - Innovation Center Gent, BASF Belgium, Ghent 9052, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1574-1843
Torsten PookDepartment of Animal Sciences, Animal Breeding and Genetics Group, University of Goettingen, Albrecht-Thaer-Weg 3, Goettingen 37075, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7874-8500

Funding

BASF
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effective planning and allocation of resources in modern breeding programs is a complex task. Breeding program design and operational management have a major impact on the success of a breeding program and changing parameters such as the number of selected/phenotyped/genotyped individuals in the breeding program will impact genetic gain, genetic diversity, and costs. As a result, careful assessment and balancing of design parameters is crucial, taking into account the trade-offs between different breeding goals and associated costs. In a previous study, we optimized the resource allocation strategy in a dairy cattle breeding scheme via the combination of stochastic simulations and kernel regression, aiming to maximize a target function containing genetic gain and the inbreeding rate under a given budget. However, the high number of simulations required when using the proposed kernel regression method to optimize a breeding program with many parameters weakens the effectiveness of such a method. In this work, we are proposing an optimization framework that builds on the concepts of kernel regression but additionally makes use of an evolutionary algorithm to allow for a more effective and general optimization. The key idea is to consider a set of potential parameter settings of the breeding program, evaluate their performance based on stochastic simulations, and use these outputs to derive new parameter settings to test in an iterative procedure. The evolutionary algorithm was implemented in a Snakemake workflow management system to allow for efficient scaling on large distributed computing platforms. The algorithm achieved stabilization around the same optimum with a massively reduced number of simulations. Thereby, the incorporation of class variables and accounting for a higher number of parameters in the optimization framework leads to substantially reduced computing time and better scaling for the desired optimization of a breeding program.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBreedingComputer SimulationStochastic ProcessesAnimalsCattleModels, Geneticbreeding programkernel regressionoptimization, evolutionary algorithmresource allocationstochastic simulation

Identifiers

PMID39495659
PMCPMC11708219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.