ArticleJAMA network open2024
Actionable Structural Variant Detection via RNA-NGS and DNA-NGS in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- NRG1 fusions in non-small cell lung cancer: biology, diagnostics, and emerging HER2/HER3 therapies-a narrative review.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Review
- Review
- Multi-modal data integration reveals functionally credible predictive biomarkers in ovarian cancer.Genome medicine · 2026Article
- SCRUM-Japan MONSTAR3 hematology cohort: a nationwide multi-omics integrated platform for next-generation precision medicine in hematologic malignancies.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
- HER2 Alterations in Squamous Cell Lung Cancer: Biology, Therapeutic Landscape, and Emerging Precision Approaches.Cancers · 2026Review
- ALK rearrangements and resistance mutations in non-small cell lung cancer: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic implications.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2026Review
- Molecular Analysis of EBUS-TBNA Samples for Nodal Staging in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2026Review
- Targeting MET in non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases: from molecular mechanism to precision therapy.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- DNA and RNA-based next-generation sequencing for companion diagnostic rearrangement detection in solid tumors.The oncologist · 2026Article
- An evaluation of taletrectinib for the treatment of ROS1+ non-small cell lung cancer.Expert review of anticancer therapy · 2026Review
- Response to crizotinib treatment for ROS1 p.H1999N mutation and secondary EGFR p.V774M mutation after drug resistance: a Case Report.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- An evolving landscape: predictive and therapeutic biomarkers in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Improvement of Diagnostics in NSCLC Patients withInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Advances in Targeted Therapy for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Current Progress and Future Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Molecular Characterization of Oncogenic Gene Fusions in a Large Real-World Cohort of Solid Tumors.Cancer research communications · 2025Article
- Mechanistic insights into MET exon 14 skipping mutations and their role in tumor progression.Biochemical Society transactions · 2025Review
- Molecular Characterization of NUT Carcinoma: A Report from the NUT Carcinoma Registry.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025Article
- Aging population of tracheal, bronchus, and lung cancer: global, regional, and national burden-insights from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Real-World Data Analysis of Genomic Alterations Detected by a Dual DNA-RNA Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Test.Cancer science · 2025Article
- Comprehensive Evaluation of a 1021-Gene Panel in FFPE and Liquid Biopsy for Analytical and Clinical Use.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for non-small cell lung cancer suggest that RNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) may improve the detection of fusions and splicing variants compared with DNA-NGS alone. However, there is limited adoption of RNA-NGS in routine oncology clinical care today. Objective: To analyze clinical evidence from a diverse cohort of patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and compare the detection of NCCN-recommended actionable structural variants (aSVs; fusions and splicing variants) via concurrent DNA and RNA-NGS vs DNA-NGS alone. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multisite, retrospective cohort study examined patients sequenced between February 2021 and October 2023 within the deidentified, Tempus multimodal database, consisting of linked molecular and clinical data. Participants included patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and sufficient tissue sample quantities for both RNA-NGS and DNA-NGS testing. Exposures: Received results from RNA-NGS and DNA-NGS solid-tissue profiling assays. Main Outcomes and Measures: Detection rates of NCCN guideline-based structural variants (ALK, ROS1, RET and NTRK1/2/3 fusions, as well as MET exon 14 skipping splicing alterations) found uniquely by RNA-NGS. Results: In the evaluable cohort of 5570 patients, median (IQR) age was 67.8 (61.3-75.4) years, and 2989 patients (53.7%) were female. The prevalence of actionable structural variants detected by either RNA-NGS or DNA-NGS was 8.8% (n = 491), with 86.7% (n = 426) of these detected by DNA-NGS. Concurrent RNA-NGS and DNA-NGS identified 15.3% more patients harboring aSVs compared with DNA-NGS alone (491 vs 426 patients, respectively), including 14.3% more patients harboring actionable fusions (376 vs 329 patients) and 18.6% more patients harboring MET exon 14 skipping alterations (115 vs 97 patients). There was no significant association between the assay used for aSV detection and aSV-targeted therapeutic adoption or clinical outcome. Emerging structural variants (eSVs) were found to have a combined prevalence to be 0.7%, with only 47.5% of eSVs detected by DNA-NGS. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, the detection of structural variants via concurrent RNA-NGS and DNA-NGS was higher across multiple NCCN-guideline recommended biomarkers compared with DNA-NGS alone, suggesting that RNA-NGS should be routinely implemented in the care of patients with advanced NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.