ArticleSpine deformity2025
3D external shape analysis and barycentremetry can provide early signs of progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Article in Spine deformity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Different kinematic strategies are adopted by AIS patients during walking depending on their Lenke type.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOur objective was to analysis the barycentremetry, obtained from the external envelope reconstruction of biplanar radiographs, in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and to determine whether assessing would help predict the distinction between progressive and stable AIS at the early stage.
methodsA retrospective study with a multicentre cohort of 205 AIS was conducted. All AIS underwent a biplanar X-ray between 2013 and 2020. Inclusion criteria were Cobb angle between 10° and 25°; Risser sign lower than 3; age higher than 10 years; and no previous treatment. A 3D spine reconstruction was performed, and the barycentremetry parameters were computed, i.e., the center of mass position at the apex and the axial torque at the apex, the upper and lower junction. A severity index, helping to distinguish stable and progressive AIS, was computed on the first radiograph, and weighted according to these parameters. A clinical and radiographic monitoring determined if AIS were classified such a stable or progressive scoliosis.
resultsOne hundred and sixty-two AIS were included (i.e., 87 were classified as stable and 75 as progressive). The apex center of mass position was different between the stable and progressive AIS groups (6 mm, SD = 4 mm for the whole cohort; 5 mm, SD = 4 mm for stable AIS versus 7 mm, SD = 4 mm for progressive AIS; p = 0.02). In AIS thoracic, the specificity and positive predictive value of the severity index increased by 19% and 16%, respectively, by adding the apex vertebral axial torque.
conclusionEarly assessment of the external envelope from biplanar X-ray reconstruction of idiopathic scoliosis showed that the apex centre of mass position was significantly different between progressive and stable scoliosis. The inclusion of the axial torque of the apex vertebra in the severity index is promising to help the clinician distinguish between stable and progressive thoracic AIS at an early stage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II - Prognostic studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39495403What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.