ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2025
Racial/Ethnic Impact on Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries: A Multicentric Retrospective Study.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk Factors for Gestational Stress Urinary Incontinence: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International urogynecology journal · 2026Pooled it
- Racial and ethnic disparities in obstetric anal sphincter injury: cross-sectional study in the USA.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisObstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs), third- and fourth-degree lacerations, represent a severe obstetric complication. Previous studies reported a higher incidence of OASIs in Asian women in non-Asian countries. This study was aimed at establishing a different OASIs prevalence among the racial/ethnic groups in Southern European centers.
methodsA multicenter retrospective study that included pregnant women who had vaginal singleton delivery between January 2019 and September 2022 in two Italian University hospitals, Naples and Novara, was conducted. We excluded cesarean sections, nonvertex presentation, preterm delivery, multiple pregnancies, congenital malformations, or stillbirths. Statistical analysis with an independent association of ethnicity to the risk of OASIs using clinical characteristics-adjusted multivariate logistic regression was performed.
resultsA total of 3,049 pregnant women were included. 2.33% (71 patients) had an OASI. The median age was 31 years (IQR 7.00) and median gestational age was 39 weeks (IQR 1.40). Mean birth weight was 3,300 g (IQR 580.00). 1' and 5' Apgar scores were 9 and 9. The univariate logistic regression was not statistically significant. Multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for baseline clinical characteristics showed an OR 2.540 (p value 0.01) for OASIs in Asian women. Primiparous and secondiparous were protective factors for OASIs with OR 0.224 (p value < 0.001) and OR 0.209 (p value 0.01).
conclusionsOur results confirm racial/ethnic disparities regarding OASIs, with an elevated risk for Asian women in Southern Europe. Prevention strategies and obstetric care in developed countries should be modulated to offset the risk of OASIs in this population. Additional research is needed to explain the specific mechanisms of these disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39495332What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.