Observational studyClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2025
In-hospital bioimpedance-derived total body water predicts short-term cardiovascular mortality and re-hospitalizations in acute decompensated heart failure patients.
Observational study in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioimpedance utility in heart failure.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Diuretics in Cardiovascular Disease: For How Long and at What Dose?Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Predicting heart failure decompensation: focus on non-invasive monitoring.Cardiology journal · 2026Review
- Bioelectrical impedance analysis and physical function improved risk prediction for cardiac dysfunction in hemodialysis patients.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Bioelectrical impedance analysis instruments: how do they differ, what do we need for clinical assessment?Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHospital re-admissions in heart failure (HF) patients are mostly caused by an acute exacerbation of their chronic congestion. Bioimpedance analysis (BIA) has emerged as a promising non-invasive method to assess the volume status in HF. However, its correlation with clinically assessed volume status and its prognostic value in the acute intra-hospital setting remains uncertain. METHODS AND
resultsIn this single-center observational study, patients (n = 49) admitted to the cardiology ward for acute decompensated HF (ADHF) underwent a daily BIA-derived volume status assessment. Median hospital stay was 7 (4-10) days. Twenty patients (40%) reached the composite endpoint of cardiovascular mortality or re-hospitalization for HF over 6 months. Patients at discharge displayed improved NYHA class, lower body weight, plasma and blood volume, as well as lower NT-proBNP levels compared to the admission. Compared to patients with total body water (TBW) less than or equal to that predicted by body weight, those with higher relative TBW levels had elevated NT-proBNP and E/e´ (both p < 0.05) at discharge. In the Cox multivariate regression analysis, the BIA-derived delta TBW between admission and discharge showed a 23% risk reduction for each unit increase (HR = 0.776; CI 0.67-0.89; p = 0.0006). In line with this finding, TBW at admission had the highest prediction importance of the combined endpoint for a subgroup of high-risk HF patients (n = 35) in a neural network analysis.
conclusionIn ADHF patients, BIA-derived TBW is associated with the increased risk of HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death over 6 months. The role of BIA for prognostic stratification merits further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.