Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39495309›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2025

The effects of caffeine mouth rinsing on selective attention as a function of different caffeine concentrations and perceived taste intensity in recreationally active males at rest: a randomized placebo-controlled cross-over trial.

Cemile Balcı, Neşe Toktaş, Kemal Alparslan Erman, Abdurrahman Aktop, Ethem Kavukçu, Asuman Şahan

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cemile BalcıInstitute of Medical Science, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6153-6261
Neşe ToktaşFaculty of Sports Sciences, Akdeniz University, Antalya, 07058, Turkey. nesetoktas@akdeniz.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3206-6536
Kemal Alparslan ErmanFaculty of Sports Sciences, Akdeniz University, Antalya, 07058, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6056-4524
Abdurrahman AktopFaculty of Sports Sciences, Akdeniz University, Antalya, 07058, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5009-4004
Ethem KavukçuSports Medicine, Akdeniz University Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4329-1763
Asuman ŞahanFaculty of Sports Sciences, Akdeniz University, Antalya, 07058, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3198-1185

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleThe effect of caffeine mouth rinsing (CAF-MR) on cognitive performance has not been thoroughly investigated.

objectivesTo evaluate the effects of different concentrations of CAF-MR on selective attention in relation to perceived taste intensity.

methodsA total of 30 healthy and recreationally active male subjects were included in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. Interventions included MR for 20 s at rest with three different caffeine solutions (0.24% [60 mg/25 mL], 0.6% [150 mg/25 mL], and 1.2% [300 mg/25 mL]), MR with 25 mL water (placebo), and no MR (control). Data on Victoria Stroop Test (VST) and the perceived taste intensity were recorded at five sessions.

resultsCAF-MR-300 mg intervention significantly decreased completion time (from 62.93 ± 19.07 to 57.01 ± 16.74 s, p = 0.002 in Part D), while CAF-MR-150 mg intervention significantly decreased number of errors in Part D (7.00 ± 6.21 vs. 5.63 ± 5.76, p = 0.04) and Part C (8.77 ± 8.80 vs. 7.10 ± 7.11, p = 0.02). Perceived difficulty was significantly decreased both after CAF-MR with 150 mg (5.57 ± 1.65 vs. 4.77 ± 1.98, p = 0.006) and 300 mg (5.95 ± 1.77vs. 4.67 ± 1.96, p < 0.001). Perceived taste intensity for 300 mg of caffeine was negatively correlated with completion time (r: ranged, 0.37 to 0.46, p ranged, 0.045 to 0.009) after 300 mg, 150 mg (p ranged, 0.04 to 0.005) and placebo (p ranged 0.044 to 0.03) interventions.

conclusionsThis study is the first to demonstrate that CAF-MR shows dose-dependent effects on selective attention in healthy recreational males, such as improved speed (for 300 mg caffeine), reduced error rate (for 150 mg caffeine) and decrease in perceived difficulty (for 150 and 300 mg caffeine).

Indexed as

AttentionCaffeineCentral Nervous System StimulantsMouthwashesTasteTaste PerceptionAdultCross-Over StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodHumansMaleYoung AdultCaffeineCentral Nervous System StimulantsMouthwashesCaffeine concentrationCaffeine mouth rinsingControlPerceived taste intensityPlaceboSelective attentionStroop task

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.