Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39495276›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular and interventional radiology2024

Complications of Deep Venous Stenting and Their Management.

Rachael I Morris, Taha Khan, Stephen A Black

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A duodenocaval fistula due to erosion of a covered vena cava stent after 10 years.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2026
    Article
  4. Radiofrequency wire-assisted recanalization of chronic venous stent occlusions.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rachael I MorrisAcademic Department of Vascular Surgery, School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, 1st Floor North Wing, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK. rachael.morris@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2076-8741
Taha KhanAcademic Department of Vascular Surgery, School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, 1st Floor North Wing, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Stephen A BlackAcademic Department of Vascular Surgery, School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, 1st Floor North Wing, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complications after iliofemoral and inferior vena cava stenting are rare, and most can be managed effectively without significant long-term consequences for the patient. Nevertheless, the procedure is not without risk, and clinicians considering starting a venous practice must be aware of the range of complications that can occur, which range from minor access site bleeds to fatal arrhythmia from stent migration to the heart. Most complications can be avoided with appropriate patient selection, stent sizing, and careful access and deployment techniques.

Indexed as

StentsVena Cava, InferiorEndovascular ProceduresFemoral VeinHumansIliac VeinPostoperative ComplicationsVenous ThrombosisDeep vein thrombosisPost-thrombotic syndromeVenous stenting

Identifiers

PMID39495276
PMCPMC11621186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.