ReviewOral and maxillofacial surgery2024
Surgical management of conventional ameloblastoma: a retrospective cohort study over the past 21 years.
Review in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Conventional ameloblastoma presents infiltrative behavior and its treatment ranges from enucleation combined with adjuvant therapies to marginal/segmental resection. The purpose of this study is to present a cohort of twenty-four patients with ameloblastoma treated in the same institution after marginal/segmental resection for the past 21 years. All cases had diagnosis confirmation by incisional biopsy. Patients with an unconfirmed diagnosis and missing follow-up information were excluded. Data were categorized into clinicopathological, surgical and recurrence aspects. Thirteen patients were females (54%). The mean age was 40.2 years. Mandible was the most affected site (91%). The mean length of the lesions was 4.10 cm (± 2.06) and the multilocular aspect was predominant (83%). Root resorption (37.5%), tooth displacement (45.8%) and cortical perforation (45.8%) were noticed. Histologically, most of the cases were follicular (n = 19,79%). Microscopic analysis showed positive margins in four cases. Patients were treated by marginal (n = 19) and segmental (n = 5) resections. Recurrence occurred in two cases (8.33%). Both primary and recurrent ameloblastomas were treated through marginal resections and no recurrence was observed during the past 9 and 5 years after the last intervention, respectively. The overall mean follow-up was 79.25 months and patients are still monitored over these years. Marginal/segmental resection of conventional ameloblastoma is associated with a low recurrence rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39495234What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.