ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2024
Proposing a Methodology for Axon-Centric Analysis of IOP-Induced Mechanical Insult.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exosomes in the treatment of age-related ophthalmic diseases: an updated review.International ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Adipose-Derived Stem Cells in Ophthalmic Regenerative Medicine: From Cell Replacement to Precision Engineering.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Review
- Longitudinal changes in vessel density and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness after acute primary angle closure.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Exosome-based therapies for corneal disorders: current status and future perspectives.MedScience · 2026Review
- AI to Identify Strain-Sensitive Regions of the Optic Nerve Head Linked to Functional Loss in Glaucoma.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: IOP-induced mechanical insult on retinal ganglion cell axons within the optic nerve head (ONH) is believed to be a key factor in axonal damage and glaucoma. However, most studies focus on tissue-level mechanical deformations, overlooking that axons are long and thin, and that their susceptibility to damage likely depends on the insult's type (e.g. stretch/compression) and orientation (longitudinal/transverse). We propose an axon-centric approach to quantify IOP-induced mechanical insult from an axon perspective. Methods: We used optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans from a healthy monkey eye along with histological images of cryosections to reconstruct the axon-occupied volume including detailed lamina cribrosa (LC) pores. Tissue-level strains were determined experimentally using digital volume correlation from OCT scans at baseline and elevated IOPs, then transformed into axonal strains using axon paths estimated by a fluid mechanics simulation. Results: Axons in the LC and post-LC regions predominantly experienced longitudinal compression and transverse stretch, whereas those in the pre-LC and ONH rim mainly suffered longitudinal stretch and transverse compression. No clear patterns were observed for tissue-level strains. Conclusions: Our approach allowed discerning axonal longitudinal and transverse mechanical insults, which are likely associated with different mechanisms of axonal damage. The technique also enabled quantifying insult along individual axon paths, providing a novel link relating the retinal nerve fiber layer and the optic nerve through the LC via individual axons. This is a promising approach to establish a clearer connection between IOP-induced insult and glaucoma. Further studies should evaluate a larger cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.