Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39495176›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2025

Nationwide cohort study on the risk of high-grade cervical dysplasia and carcinoma after conservative treatment or hysterectomy for adenocarcinoma in situ.

Mirte Schaafsma, Teska N Schuurman, Pien Kootstra, Deli Issa, Ivo Hermans, Maaike C G Bleeker, Petra L M Zusterzeel, Ruud L M Bekkers, Albert G Siebers, Constantijne H Mom and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mirte SchaafsmaDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Center of Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek/Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0386-3373
Teska N SchuurmanDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Center of Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek/Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pien KootstraDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Center of Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek/Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Deli IssaDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Center of Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek/Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ivo HermansDepartment of Gynecology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Maaike C G BleekerDepartment of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Petra L M ZusterzeelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ruud L M BekkersDepartment of Gynecology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Albert G SiebersPalga, the Dutch nationwide pathology databank, Houten, The Netherlands.
Constantijne H MomBiomarkers and Imaging, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nienke E van TrommelDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Center of Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek/Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Internationally, little consensus exists about the best treatment for cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS). This study aimed to determine the incidence of recurrent high-grade cervical dysplasia and development of local cervical cancer after treatment for AIS. This nationwide, retrospective cohort study included patients with AIS, who were treated by a large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ), cold-knife conization (CKC), or hysterectomy between January 1, 1990 and December 31, 2021 in the Netherlands. Pathology reports were retrieved from the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Databank (Palga). Primary outcomes were the cumulative incidences of high-grade cervical dysplasia (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3, and AIS) and local cervical cancer up to 20 years after primary treatment. In total, 4243 patients with AIS were included. The primary treatment was a LLETZ, CKC, or hysterectomy in 1593, 2118, and 532 patients, respectively. The incidence of recurrent high-grade cervical dysplasia after LLETZ (10.5%; 95%CI: 8.6-12.3) was higher than after CKC (5.5%; 95%CI: 4.4-6.6, p <.0001). When a radical excision, that is, surgical margins free of dysplasia at end of treatment, was achieved, the incidence of recurrent high-grade dysplasia and local cervical cancer did not differ between LLETZ (5.6% [95%CI: 3.3-7.9] and 1.9% [95%CI: 0-4.4]) and CKC (4.7% [95%CI: 3.5-5.8], p = .631 and 1.5% [95%CI: 0.7-2.3], p = .918). After hysterectomy, none of the patients developed cervical dysplasia or local cervical cancer. Conservative treatment for AIS can be considered a safe and final treatment modality when a radical excision is achieved.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma in SituConservative TreatmentHysterectomyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedConizationFemaleHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNetherlandsRetrospective Studiesadenocarcinoma in situcervical cancersurgical treatment

Identifiers

PMID39495176
PMCPMC11736995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.