Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39495171›Full record

ArticleEndocrine connections2025

Clinical features and search for genetic determinants of postprandial hypoglycaemia.

Qian Ren, Xueyao Han, Siqian Gong, Simin Zhang, Tianhao Ba, Yilin Zhao, Yating Li, Yan'ai Wang, Xianghai Zhou, Yufeng Li and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine connections, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Xueyao Han
Siqian Gong
Simin Zhang
Tianhao Ba
Yilin Zhao
Yating Li
Yan'ai Wang
Xianghai Zhou
Yufeng Li

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To test whether postprandial hypoglycaemia is an extreme and repeatable phenotype of glucose metabolism. We also explored the genetic determinants of this phenotype. Design and methods: We conducted this study using data from the Pinggu Metabolic Disease Study database (n = 3,345). We selected subjects after an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (2 h glucose < 3 mmol/L) and compared their clinical features with those of subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT). In addition, we selected 75 subjects as a super-healthy control group. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed on subjects with postprandial hypoglycaemic and super-healthy controls. We also evaluated several candidate genes believed to be important in pancreatic hypoglycaemia. Results: We found 13 participants (0.39%) who had an OGTT (2 h glucose < 3 mmol/L). Ten of these patients were men (76.9%). All 13 participants had insulin >3 μU/mL when postprandial blood glucose levels were <3 mmol/L. WES analysis identified one gene, paternally expressed 3 (PEG3), which had three rare mutations in four patients (30.8%). Minor allele frequencies of rare PEG3 mutations were significantly higher in subjects with postprandial hypoglycaemia than in super-healthy controls. Among the four subjects with PEG3 gene mutations, 71.4% were men, and their body mass index was significantly lower than that of the NGT group. Conclusions: Postprandial hypoglycaemia is an extreme and reproducible phenotype in the general population. PEG3 mutations may represent a potential genetic aetiology for postprandial hypoglycaemia. Further research with larger and more diverse populations and a broader genetic focus is needed to understand the genetic basis of postprandial hypoglycaemia.

Indexed as

PEG3postprandial hypoglycaemiawhole-exome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID39495171
PMCPMC11728931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.