ArticleJNCI cancer spectrum2024
County-level racial disparities in prostate cancer-specific mortality from 2005 to 2020.
Article in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Trends in Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates.JAMA network open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLocal conditions where people live continue to influence prostate cancer outcomes. By examining local characteristics associated with trends in Black-White differences in prostate cancer-specific mortality over time, we aim to identify factors driving county-level prostate cancer-specific mortality disparities over a 15-year period.
methodsWe linked county-level data (Area Health Resource File) with clinicodemographic data of men with prostate cancer (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry) from 2005 to 2020. Generalized linear mixed models evaluated associations between race and county-level age-standardized prostate cancer-specific mortality, adjusting for age; year of death; rurality; county-level education; income; uninsured rates; and densities of urologists, radiologists, primary care practitioners, and hospital beds.
resultsIn 1085 counties, 185 390 patients were identified of which 15.8% were non-Hispanic Black. Racial disparities in prostate cancer-specific mortality narrowed from 2005 to 2020 (25.4 per 100 000 to 19.2 per 100 000 overall, 57.9 per 100 000 to 38 per 100 000 for non-Hispanic Black patients, and 23.4 per 100 000 to 18.3 per 100 000 for non-Hispanic White patients). For non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White patients, county prostate cancer-specific mortality changes varied greatly (-65% to +77% and -61% to +112%, respectively). From 2016 to 2020, non-Hispanic Black patients harbored greater prostate cancer-specific mortality risk (relative risk = 2.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.01 to 2.18); higher radiation oncologist density was associated with lower mortality risk (relative risk = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.89 to 0.98), while other practitioner densities were not.
conclusionAlthough overall rates improved, specific counties experienced worsening race-based disparities over time. Identifying locations of highest (and lowest) mortality disparities remains critical to development of location-specific solutions to racial disparities in prostate cancer outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.