Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39495117›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024

A deep learning method to integrate extracelluar miRNA with mRNA for cancer studies.

Tasbiraha Athaya, Xiaoman Li, Haiyan Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tasbiraha AthayaDepartment of Computer Science, University of Central Florida, 4000 Central Florida BLVD, Orlando, FL, 32816, United States.
Xiaoman LiBurnett School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Central Florida, 4000 Central Florida BLVD, Orlando, FL, 32816, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9209-458X
Haiyan HuDepartment of Computer Science, University of Central Florida, 4000 Central Florida BLVD, Orlando, FL, 32816, United States.

Funding

National Science Foundation 2015838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationExtracellular miRNAs (exmiRs) and intracellular mRNAs both can serve as promising biomarkers and therapeutic targets for various diseases. However, exmiR expression data is often noisy, and obtaining intracellular mRNA expression data usually involves intrusive procedures. To gain valuable insights into disease mechanisms, it is thus essential to improve the quality of exmiR expression data and develop noninvasive methods for assessing intracellular mRNA expression.

resultsWe developed CrossPred, a deep-learning multi-encoder model for the cross-prediction of exmiRs and mRNAs. Utilizing contrastive learning, we created a shared embedding space to integrate exmiRs and mRNAs. This shared embedding was then used to predict intracellular mRNA expression from noisy exmiR data and to predict exmiR expression from intracellular mRNA data. We evaluated CrossPred on three types of cancers and assessed its effectiveness in predicting the expression levels of exmiRs and mRNAs. CrossPred outperformed the baseline encoder-decoder model, exmiR or mRNA-based models, and variational autoencoder models. Moreover, the integration of exmiR and mRNA data uncovered important exmiRs and mRNAs associated with cancer. Our study offers new insights into the bidirectional relationship between mRNAs and exmiRs. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The datasets and tool are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13891508.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMicroRNAsNeoplasmsRNA, MessengerComputational BiologyHumansMicroRNAsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID39495117
PMCPMC11565234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.