Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39495109›Full record

ArticleeLife2024

Difficulty in artificial word learning impacts targeted memory reactivation and its underlying neural signatures.

Arndt-Lukas Klaassen, Björn Rasch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arndt-Lukas KlaassenDepartment of Psychology, Division of Cognitive Biopsychology and Methods, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8404-6295
Björn RaschDepartment of Psychology, Division of Cognitive Biopsychology and Methods, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7607-3415

Funding

European Research Council 677875Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 168602
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sleep associated memory consolidation and reactivation play an important role in language acquisition and learning of new words. However, it is unclear to what extent properties of word learning difficulty impact sleep associated memory reactivation. To address this gap, we investigated in 22 young healthy adults the effectiveness of auditory targeted memory reactivation (TMR) during non-rapid eye movement sleep of artificial words with easy and difficult to learn phonotactical properties. Here, we found that TMR of the easy words improved their overnight memory performance, whereas TMR of the difficult words had no effect. By comparing EEG activities after TMR presentations, we found an increase in slow wave density independent of word difficulty, whereas the spindle-band power nested during the slow wave up-states - as an assumed underlying activity of memory reactivation - was significantly higher in the easy/effective compared to the difficult/ineffective condition. Our findings indicate that word learning difficulty by phonotactics impacts the effectiveness of TMR and further emphasize the critical role of prior encoding depth in sleep associated memory reactivation.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyAdultFemaleHumansLearningMaleMemoryMemory ConsolidationSleepYoung Adultalpha oscillationshumanneurosciencephonotacticsprior knowledgesleep-dependent memory consolidationsleep spindlestargeted memory reactivation

Identifiers

PMID39495109
PMCPMC11534334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.