Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39495069›Full record

ArticleThe journal of spinal cord medicine2026

Experiences in the tourism industry after spinal cord injury: A scoping review.

Jorja Greenwood, Louise Gustafsson, Kim Walder

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of spinal cord medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jorja GreenwoodSchool of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia.
Louise GustafssonSchool of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5232-0987
Kim WalderSchool of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9692-9054

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextDespite being important for health and wellbeing, people with a disability engage in tourism significantly less than people who are non-disabled. It is important to understand why this is occurring so that we can set an agenda toward accessible tourism.

objectiveTo understand the tourism experiences and needs of people living with spinal cord injury.

methodsSeven databases were searched for papers related to tourism engagement by people with a spinal cord injury. Included papers were published in English from 2000 and included gray material. Qualitative and quantitative papers were charted separately, with the key findings extracted.

resultsThe search identified 3513 papers, duplicates were removed, 2192 papers were screened at title and abstract, 90 papers screened at full text, and 31 papers were included in the final synthesis. Fifty-eight percent of the papers explored American tourism, and 45% were articles in a spinal cord injury magazine. Collectively, the studies, conference papers, and magazine articles highlighted environmental and personal factors that support or hinder engagement in tourism, the impacts on the experience, and recommendations.

conclusionPeople with a spinal cord injury want to engage in tourism, however environmental and personal factors create challenges that prevent engagement. Advocacy efforts and consumer partnering are required to support disability education and improve accessible tourism. The limited amount of high-quality research highlights a gap in our knowledge and minimizes the trustworthiness and transferability of the findings from this scoping review.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord InjuriesTourismHumansAccessibilityDisabilityInclusiveLeisureWheelchair

Identifiers

PMID39495069
PMCPMC12931324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.