Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39494958›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2024

Determination of Species-Specific Differences in Intracranial Volume of Tuj Sheep and Hair Goats Using Stereology and Computed Tomography Methods.

Ali Koçyiğit, Betül Kanik, İsmail Demircioğlu, Yasin Demiraslan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Calculation of intracranial volume in Koçeri sheep by computed tomography scan and Cavalieri principle.Veterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ali KoçyiğitHarran University Laboratory and Veterinary Health Vocational School, Birecik, Sanliurfa, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-9354-7480
Betül KanikDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-7740-2268
İsmail DemircioğluDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Harran University, Eyyubiye, Sanliurfa, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-0724-3019
Yasin DemiraslanDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-3612-6142

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intracranial cavity contains vitally important organs. The brain, cerebellum, meninges and the vessels that supply these organs are located in the intracranial cavity. Therefore, it is important to learn about the intracranial cavity and to study it. However, there is limited information about the intracranial cavity in the veterinary field. The aim of this study was to determine the differences between the intracranial cavities of different species of animals by using stereology and tomography methods, volume calculations and morphometric measurements. In addition, the compatibility of the methods used with each other was investigated. In the study, six male adult goats and six male adult sheep were used. In this study, the intracranial cavities of sheep and goats were calculated by using Cavalieri's principle and 3D modelling using tomography sections. Morphometric measurements were taken over the intracranial space, and index calculations were made. In 3D models using computed tomography, the intracranial volume was 153.31 ± 24.06 cm

Indexed as

BrainGoatsSpecies SpecificityTomography, X-Ray ComputedAnimalsImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleSheepSheep, DomesticBland‐Altman analysisCavalieri's principlecomputed tomographygoatsheep

Identifiers

PMID39494958
PMCPMC11533207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.