ArticleThe oncologist2025
Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in partially platinum-sensitive, platinum-resistant, or platinum-refractory ovarian cancer: a prospective study.
Article in The oncologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Liposomal nanotherapeutics for cancer treatment: Targeted delivery and immunotherapy.International journal of immunopathology and pharmacologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) for patients with partially platinum-sensitive, platinum-resistant, or platinum-refractory ovarian cancer.
methodsPatients with partially platinum-sensitive, platinum-resistant, or platinum-refractory ovarian cancer were recruited in this prospective, open-label, single-arm, multicenter study. Eligible patients were given 4-6 cycles of PLD (40 mg/m2 on day 1, every 4 weeks). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), quality of life, and safety. Exploratory endpoints included the change trend of CA125 and platinum-free interval.
resultsBetween June 2017 and November 2020, 167 eligible patients were included in the full analysis set. The median PFS and OS were 6.8 months (95% CI, 4.4-9.3 months) and 19.1 months (95% CI, 15.0-23.3 months), respectively. The ORR and DCR were 32.3% and 60.5%, respectively. The ORR (62.3 vs 22.5%) and DCR (84.9 vs 60.7%) of patients with a CA125 decrease after the first cycle were significantly higher than those without a CA125 decrease (all P < .05). Grade ≥ 3 and serious adverse events were reported in 9.9% and 3.9% of patients, respectively. No treatment-related death was observed.
conclusionPLD showed promising efficacy and manageable tolerability in patients with partially platinum-sensitive, platinum-resistant, or platinum-refractory ovarian cancer.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1900022962.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.