Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39494583›Full record

ReviewLiver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver2025

New Scenarios in Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Ezequiel Mauro, Manuel Rodríguez-Perálvarez, Antonio D'Alessio, Gonzalo Crespo, Federico Piñero, Eleonora De Martin, Jordi Colmenero, David James Pinato, Alejandro Forner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Hepatocellular carcinoma: Epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ezequiel MauroBarcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Group, Liver Unit, ICMDM, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0757-7676
Manuel Rodríguez-PerálvarezCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1795-2919
Antonio D'AlessioDepartment of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9164-3671
Gonzalo CrespoCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1178-4897
Federico PiñeroSchool of Medicine, Hospital Universitario Austral, Austral University, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-9528-2279
Eleonora De MartinAP-HP Hôpital Paul-Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, INSERM Unit 1193, Université Paris-Saclay, FHU Hepatinov, Villejuif, France.ORCID 0009-0001-7602-5621
Jordi ColmeneroCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6024-8479
David James PinatoDepartment of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3529-0103
Alejandro FornerBarcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Group, Liver Unit, ICMDM, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9014-4950

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsDespite liver transplantation (LT) is considered the optimal treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), particularly in patients with impaired liver function, the shortage of donors has forced the application of very restrictive criteria for selecting ideal candidates for whom LT can offer the best outcome. With the evolving LT landscape due to the advent of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) and the steady increase in donors, major efforts have been made to expand the transplant eligibility criteria for HCC. In addition, the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for the treatment of HCC, with demonstrated efficacy in earlier stages, has revolutionized the therapeutic approach for these patients, and their integration in the setting of LT is challenging. Management of immunological compromise from ICIs, including the wash-out period before LT and post-LT immunosuppression adjustments, is crucial to balance the risk of graft rejection against HCC recurrence. Additionally, the effects of increased immunosuppression on non-hepatic complications must be understood to prevent them from becoming obstacles to long-term OS. METHODS AND

resultsIn this review, we will evaluate the emerging evidence and its implications for the future of LT in HCC. Addressing these novel challenges and opportunities, while integrating the current clinical evidence with predictive algorithms, would ensure a fair balance between individual patient needs and the overall population benefit in the LT system.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsLiver TransplantationGraft RejectionHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunosuppressive AgentsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPatient SelectionImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunosuppressive AgentsHCCimmunotherapyliver transplant

Identifiers

PMID39494583
PMCPMC11891387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.