Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39494405›Full record

ReviewUS cardiology2024

Shared Decision-making in Palliative and End-of-life Care in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.

Sarah Godfrey, Alexis Barnes, Jing Gao, Melanie S Sulistio, Jason N Katz, Sarah Chuzi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in US cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah GodfreyDivision of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, TX.
Alexis BarnesDivision of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pittsburgh, PA.
Jing GaoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago, IL.
Melanie S SulistioDivision of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, TX.
Jason N KatzDivision of Cardiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine New York, NY.
Sarah ChuziDivision of Cardiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago, IL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients and clinicians in the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) are often tasked with making high-stakes decisions about aggressive or life- sustaining therapies. Shared decision-making (SDM), a collaborative process where patients and clinicians work together to make medical decisions that are aligned with a patient's goals and values, is therefore highly relevant in the CICU, especially in the context of palliative or end-of-life decisions. Despite its importance, there are barriers to optimal integration and implementation of SDM. This review describes the fundamentals and models of SDM, the role of SDM in the CICU, and evidence-based strategies to promote SDM in the CICU.

Indexed as

end-of-life carePalliative careshared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID39494405
PMCPMC11526488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.