Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39494352›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024

Comparison of sGC activator and sGC stimulator in 5/6 nephrectomized rats on high-salt-diet.

Xin Chen, Yingquan Xiong, Shufei Zeng, Denis Delić, Mohamed Gaballa, Philipp Kalk, Thomas Klein, Bernhard K Krämer, Berthold Hocher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xin Chen *Fifth Department of Medicine (Nephrology/Endocrinology/Rheumatology/Pneumology), University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Yingquan Xiong *Fifth Department of Medicine (Nephrology/Endocrinology/Rheumatology/Pneumology), University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Shufei ZengFifth Department of Medicine (Nephrology/Endocrinology/Rheumatology/Pneumology), University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Denis DelićFifth Department of Medicine (Nephrology/Endocrinology/Rheumatology/Pneumology), University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Mohamed GaballaDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Benha University, Toukh, Egypt.
Philipp KalkDepartment of Nephrology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany.
Thomas KleinDepartment of Cardiometabolic Diseases Research, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach, Germany.
Bernhard K KrämerFifth Department of Medicine (Nephrology/Endocrinology/Rheumatology/Pneumology), University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Berthold HocherFifth Department of Medicine (Nephrology/Endocrinology/Rheumatology/Pneumology), University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) stimulators and activators are known to enhance kidney function in various models of chronic kidney disease (CKD) by increasing cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP). Their differential effects on CKD progression, particularly under conditions of oxidative stress, remain unexplored by direct comparative studies. Methods: We conducted a side-by-side comparison using 5/6 nephrectomized rats on a high salt diet (5/6Nx+HSD) to evaluate the efficacy of the sGC stimulator BAY 41-8543 and the sGC activator BAY 60-2770 in CKD progression. BAY 41-8543 (1 mg/kg; twice daily) and BAY 60-2770 (1 mg/kg; once daily) were administered by gavage for 11 weeks. Results: The 5/6Nx+HSD model led to increased plasma creatinine, proteinuria, and blood pressure. Both BAY 41-8543 and BAY 60-2770 significantly reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure to a similar extent but did not improve renal function parameters. Notably, BAY 60-2770 reduced renal fibrosis, including interstitial fibrosis and glomerulosclerosis, whereas BAY 41-8543 did not. These antifibrotic effects of BAY 60-2770 were independent of blood pressure reduction. Proteomic analysis revealed that BAY 60-2770 corrected the upregulation of 9 proteins associated with apoptosis and fibrosis, including Caspase-3, MKK6 (Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinase 6), Prdx5 (Peroxiredoxin-5), in the 5/6Nx+HSD group. Discussion: In contrast, BAY 41-8543 had no significant impact on these proteins. sGC activators were more effective than sGC stimulators in reducing renal fibrosis in 5/6 nephrectomized rats on a high salt diet, and this effect was due to modulation of apoptosis-associated proteins beyond the control of blood pressure.

Indexed as

apoptosischronic kidney diseaserenal fibrosissoluble guanylate cyclase activatorsoluble guanylate cyclase stimulator

Identifiers

PMID39494352
PMCPMC11527642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.