ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Comparison of sGC activator and sGC stimulator in 5/6 nephrectomized rats on high-salt-diet.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators or activators for chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Soluble guanylate cyclase modulators-a novel therapeutic approach for diabetic kidney disease.Renal failure · 2025Review
- Riociguat Alleviates Cisplatin-Caused Kidney Injury by Suppressing Oxidative Stress and Inflammation.Biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) stimulators and activators are known to enhance kidney function in various models of chronic kidney disease (CKD) by increasing cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP). Their differential effects on CKD progression, particularly under conditions of oxidative stress, remain unexplored by direct comparative studies. Methods: We conducted a side-by-side comparison using 5/6 nephrectomized rats on a high salt diet (5/6Nx+HSD) to evaluate the efficacy of the sGC stimulator BAY 41-8543 and the sGC activator BAY 60-2770 in CKD progression. BAY 41-8543 (1 mg/kg; twice daily) and BAY 60-2770 (1 mg/kg; once daily) were administered by gavage for 11 weeks. Results: The 5/6Nx+HSD model led to increased plasma creatinine, proteinuria, and blood pressure. Both BAY 41-8543 and BAY 60-2770 significantly reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure to a similar extent but did not improve renal function parameters. Notably, BAY 60-2770 reduced renal fibrosis, including interstitial fibrosis and glomerulosclerosis, whereas BAY 41-8543 did not. These antifibrotic effects of BAY 60-2770 were independent of blood pressure reduction. Proteomic analysis revealed that BAY 60-2770 corrected the upregulation of 9 proteins associated with apoptosis and fibrosis, including Caspase-3, MKK6 (Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinase 6), Prdx5 (Peroxiredoxin-5), in the 5/6Nx+HSD group. Discussion: In contrast, BAY 41-8543 had no significant impact on these proteins. sGC activators were more effective than sGC stimulators in reducing renal fibrosis in 5/6 nephrectomized rats on a high salt diet, and this effect was due to modulation of apoptosis-associated proteins beyond the control of blood pressure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.