The role of NOP58 in prostate cancer progression through SUMOylation regulation and drug response.

Background: Prostate cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in men. Its molecular pathogenesis is closely linked to various genetic and epigenetic alterations, including posttranslational modifications like SUMOylation. Identifying biomarkers that predict outcomes and specific therapeutic targets depends on a comprehensive understanding of these processes. With growing interest in SUMOylation as a mechanism affecting prostate cancer-related genes, this study aimed to investigate the central role of SUMOylation in prostate cancer prognostics, focusing on the significance of NOP58. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive bioinformatics analysis, integrating differential expression analysis, survival analysis, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), and single-cell transcriptomic analyses using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Key genes were identified through intersections of Venn diagrams, Boralta algorithm signatures, and machine learning models. These signaling mechanisms were validated through experimental studies, including immunohistochemical staining and gene ontology analyses. Results: The dual-gene molecular subtype analysis with SUMO1, SUMO2, and XPO1 genes revealed significant differences in survival outcomes across molecular subtypes, further emphasizing the potential impact of NOP58 on SUMOylation, a key post-translational modification, in prostate cancer. NOP58 overexpression was strongly associated with shorter overall survival (OS), progression-free interval (PFI), and disease-specific death in prostate cancer patients. Immunohistochemical analysis confirmed that NOP58 was significantly overexpressed in prostate cancer tissues compared to normal tissues. ROC curve analysis demonstrated that NOP58 could distinguish prostate cancer from control samples with high diagnostic accuracy. Gene Ontology analysis, along with GSVA and GSEA, suggested that NOP58 may be involved in cell cycle regulation and DNA repair pathways. Moreover, NOP58 knockdown led to increased BCL2 expression and decreased Ki67 levels, promoting apoptosis and inhibiting cell proliferation. Colony formation assays further showed that NOP58 knockdown inhibited, while its overexpression promoted, colony formation, highlighting the critical role of NOP58 in prostate cancer cell growth and survival. Additionally, NOP58 was linked to drug responses, including Methotrexate, Rapamycin, Sorafenib, and Vorinostat. Conclusion: NOP58 is a key regulator of prostate cancer progression through its mediation of the SUMOylation pathway. Its expression level serves as a reliable prognostic biomarker and an actionable therapeutic target, advancing precision medicine for prostate cancer. Targeting NOP58 may enhance therapeutic efficacy and improve outcomes in oncology.