Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39494344›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024

Chronic exposure to inhaled vaporized cannabis high in Δ

Jack M Ognibene, Rajeev I Desai, Praveen P Kulkarni, Craig F Ferris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jack M OgnibeneCenter for Translational NeuroImaging, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States.
Rajeev I DesaiDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Praveen P KulkarniCenter for Translational NeuroImaging, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States.
Craig F FerrisCenter for Translational NeuroImaging, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There are increasing reports of the misuse of prescription psychostimulants for cognitive enhancement together with recreational cannabis. This raises a concern that chronic use of cannabis high in Δ Methods: To address this issue we exposed male and female mice to inhaled vaporized cannabis (10.3% Δ9-THC) or placebo for 30 min each day for ten consecutive days. After 24 h, mice were imaged fully awake for changes in BOLD signal following an IP injection of Adderall (60 µg) during the scanning session. After a 2-week washout, without any cannabis or placebo exposure, mice were again imaged and challenged with Adderall during the scanning session. The data were registered to a mouse 3D MRI atlas with 134 brain regions providing site-specific increases and decreases in global brain activity. Results: Mice exposed to cannabis when compared to placebo showed a decrease in brain activation to Adderall. The blunted Adderall response was characterized by a decrease in positive BOLD signal and increase in negative BOLD. The prefrontal cortex, accumbens, ventral pallidum, caudate/putamen, and thalamus were most affected. After a 2-week wash out there were no significant differences between the cannabis and placebo groups when challenged with Adderall. Summary: This exploratory study shows that short, daily exposures to inhaled cannabis, something equivalent to recreational use, affects the sensitivity to the psychostimulant Adderall. The reduced Adderall effect on brain activity, particularly circuitry associated with dopaminergic signaling raises concerns about escalation in psychostimulant use.

Indexed as

accumbensawake animal imagingbasal gangliaBOLDfunctional MRI

Identifiers

PMID39494344
PMCPMC11528537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.