SynthesisPeerJ2024
Differences in cardiovascular disease mortality between northern and southern China under exposure to different temperatures: a systematic review.
Synthesis in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of Ambient Temperature on the Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease Incidence during 2009-2023 in Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of multimorbidity prevalence and lifestyle factors among older adults in frigid versus non-frigid zones of China.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Temperature-related indicators and risk of incident cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic multimorbidity in middle-aged and older adults: a longitudinal cohort study from CHARLS.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Monitoring air quality index with EWMA and individual charts using XGBoost and SVR residuals.MethodsX · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Due to differences in climate and other environmental factors, exposure to different temperatures in China has different effects on the relative risk (RR) of cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality. It is therefore important to compare the effects of exposure to different temperatures on CVD mortality in different regions of China. Methods: To compare these effects, we performed a meta-analysis of 21 studies identified by a search of the Web of Science and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases from January 1, 2014 to January 1, 2024. We performed the Cochran Results: The pooled estimated size of the relationship between exposure to different temperatures and CVD mortality was 1.60 (95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.42-1.80]) for the extreme cold, 1.17 (95% CI [1.10-1.25]) for the extreme heat, and 1.16 (95% CI [1.10-1.24]) for extremely high diurnal temperature range (DTR). The Egger's test showed potential publication bias in studies analyzing both the extreme cold and the extreme heat. Discussion: Extreme cold, extreme heat, and extremely high DTR are associated with an increase in CVD mortality in China, with extreme cold having the most significant effect. Residents of northern regions are more susceptible to high temperatures, while residents of southern regions are more sensitive to low temperatures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.