Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39494194›Full record

ArticleWellcome open research2024

Trends in gestational age at live birth in Scotland from 2005 to 2019: a population-based study.

Emily Moore, Sonya Scott, Jeeva John, Clara Calvert, Rachael Wood, Sarah J Stock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wellcome open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emily Moore *Public Health Scotland, Edinburgh, EH12 9EB, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9071-7978
Sonya Scott *Public Health Scotland, Edinburgh, EH12 9EB, UK.
Jeeva JohnPopulation Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, England, SO17 1BJ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9651-4193
Clara CalvertUsher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH16 4UX, UK.
Rachael Wood *Public Health Scotland, Edinburgh, EH12 9EB, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4453-623X
Sarah J Stock *Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH16 4UX, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4308-856X

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Gestation at birth is associated with short and long-term outcomes. This study used high quality, national, administrative data to examine trends in gestation at birth in Scotland. Methods: This observational study used maternity hospital discharge records for 2005 to 2019 to determine trends in the percentage of live births that were preterm (<37 weeks gestation), term (37-41 weeks), and post-term (≥42 weeks), overall and by maternal age and deprivation category. Preterm births were further examined by category of preterm birth (moderate to late [32-36 weeks]; very [28-31 weeks]; extremely [<28 weeks] preterm), and onset of labour (spontaneous; provider-initiated). Singleton and multiple births were examined separately. Aggregate logistic regression was used to estimate the annual change in the odds of a birth being in a specified gestational category. Results: The percentage of singleton births in Scotland that were preterm decreased from 2005 (6.5%, 3,361/51,665) to 2010 (5.8%, 3268/56344), then increased to 2019 (7.2%, 3,408/47,507). The percentage of singleton births that were spontaneous moderate to late, very, and extremely preterm all increased between 2010 and 2019. The percentage of singleton births that were provider-initiated moderate to late preterm also increased between 2010 and 2019, however provider-initiated very or extremely preterm birth decreased. The percentage of singleton births that were preterm increased over time across all maternal age and deprivation categories, with increases greatest in groups at highest baseline risk. The percentage of singleton births that were post-term increased from 2005 to 2009, then decreased to 2019. Conclusions: There has been an increase in spontaneous preterm birth from 2010 to 2019, which is not fully explained by changes in maternal age or deprivation. Further research to examine the contribution of other, preventable, risk factors is warranted. Trends in provider-initiated preterm birth, and post-term birth, are likely to reflect changing clinical practice.

Indexed as

EpidemiologyMaternal agePost-term birthPregnancyPremature birthScotlandSocial deprivationTerm birth

Identifiers

PMID39494194
PMCPMC11530745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.