Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39494170›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024

Gender differences in the use of an upper-extremity exoskeleton during physically and cognitively demanding tasks- a study protocol for a randomized experimental trial.

Bettina Wollesen, Julia Gräf, Lasse Hansen, Anna Gurevich, Shirley A Elprama, Andreas Argubi-Wollesen, Kevin De Pauw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bettina WollesenInstitute of Human Movement Science, Department of Human Movement and Exercise Science, Universitaet Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Julia GräfInstitute of Human Movement Science, Department of Human Movement and Exercise Science, Universitaet Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Lasse HansenInstitute of Biomechanics and Orthopaedics, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Anna GurevichInstitute of Human Movement Science, Department of Human Movement and Exercise Science, Universitaet Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Shirley A Elpramaimec-SMIT, Vrije Universiteit Brussel & FARI-AI For the Common Good Institute, Brussels, Belgium.
Andreas Argubi-WollesenexoIQ GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.
Kevin De PauwexoIQ GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Upper limb exoskeletons are recommended to alleviate muscle fatigue, particularly in working conditions inducing musculoskeletal discomfort like overhead work. However, wearing an exoskeleton might introduce cognitive-motor interference, affecting performance. Understanding its neural impact and potential gender differences in design effects is crucial. Therefore, the aim of this study is to examine exoskeleton effects addressing cross-gender comparisons, and exploring the impact on cognitive and physical workload in real-world scenarios. The research questions address the impact of exoskeleton use on muscle synergies, upper body posture, cognitive resources, comfort/discomfort, acceptance and usability. Methods: The cross-sectional study integrates a multifactorial mixed-measure design. Participants are grouped by gender (female vs. male) and working condition (with vs. without exoskeleton). Motor performance and underlying neuronal correlates (fNIRS) will be analyzed. Based on an Discussion: The study will gain insights into potential gender differences in exoskeleton use and will contribute to designing and optimizing the implementation of exoskeletons by considering muscle synergies, movement variability and cognitive resource allocation. Additionally, the study also highlights user discomfort, a crucial factor that could impede widespread adoption, particularly among females, in real-world scenarios.

Indexed as

brain–body dynamicsfunctional near infrared spectroscopymuscle synergiesoverhead workwearable robotic systems

Identifiers

PMID39494170
PMCPMC11527621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.