Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39494148›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids2024

Direct delivery of Cas9 or base editor protein and guide RNA complex enables genome editing in the retina.

Juliette Pulman, Catherine Botto, Hugo Malki, Duohao Ren, Paul Oudin, Anne De Cian, Marie As, Charlotte Izabelle, Bruno Saubamea, Valerie Forster and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Retinal organoids mirror CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing efficiency observedMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Juliette PulmanSorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, 17 rue Moreau, 75012 Paris, France.
Catherine BottoSorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, 17 rue Moreau, 75012 Paris, France.
Hugo MalkiSorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, 17 rue Moreau, 75012 Paris, France.
Duohao RenSorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, 17 rue Moreau, 75012 Paris, France.
Paul OudinSorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, 17 rue Moreau, 75012 Paris, France.
Anne De CianLaboratoire Structure et Instabilité des Génomes, INSERM U1154, CNRS 7196, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, CP26 43 rue Cuvier 75231 Paris Cedex, France.
Marie AsLaboratoire Structure et Instabilité des Génomes, INSERM U1154, CNRS 7196, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, CP26 43 rue Cuvier 75231 Paris Cedex, France.
Charlotte IzabelleUniversité Paris Cité, Inserm, CNRS, P-MIM, PICMO, 75006 Paris, France.
Bruno SaubameaUniversité Paris Cité, Inserm, CNRS, P-MIM, PICMO, 75006 Paris, France.
Valerie ForsterSorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, 17 rue Moreau, 75012 Paris, France.
Stéphane FouquetSorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, 17 rue Moreau, 75012 Paris, France.
Camille RobertSorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, 17 rue Moreau, 75012 Paris, France.
Céline PortalSorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, 17 rue Moreau, 75012 Paris, France.
Aziz El-AmraouiInstitut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, INSERM AO06, Institut de l'Audition, Unit Progressive Sensory Disorders, Pathophysiology and Therapy, 63 rue de Charenton 75012 Paris, France.
Sylvain FissonSorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, 17 rue Moreau, 75012 Paris, France.
Jean-Paul ConcordetLaboratoire Structure et Instabilité des Génomes, INSERM U1154, CNRS 7196, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, CP26 43 rue Cuvier 75231 Paris Cedex, France.
Deniz DalkaraSorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, 17 rue Moreau, 75012 Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome editing by CRISPR-Cas holds promise for the treatment of retinal dystrophies. For therapeutic gene editing, transient delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 is preferable to viral delivery which leads to long-term expression with potential adverse consequences. Cas9 protein and its guide RNA, delivered as ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes, have been successfully delivered into the retinal pigment epithelium

Indexed as

base editorCRISPR/Cas9gene editinggene therapyinherited retinal dystrophyMT: Delivery StrategiesphotoreceptorretinaRPE

Identifiers

PMID39494148
PMCPMC11531619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.