ArticleFrontiers in public health2024
Impact of caring for patients with polyhandicap on institutional health care workers' quality of life: a cross-sectional and longitudinal evaluation.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quality of life among individuals with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: crossed perspectives of institutional caregivers and parents.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Profound intellectual multiple disabilities or polyhandicap (PLH) is defined as a combination of profound mental retardation and serious motor deficits resulting in extreme dependence. Support for these patients is multidisciplinary, complex, and time-consuming. Thus, institutional health care workers (HCWs) face specific working conditions: frequent physical tasks, distressed families, and restricted feedback. Objectives: We aimed to identify determinants of quality of life (QoL) of HCWs and to study longitudinal evolution. Methods: The study used data from the French cohort EVAL-PLH. The participants were institutional HCWs of persons with PLH (age ≥ 3 years at the time of inclusion; age at onset of cerebral lesion <3 years old). Two populations were used: (1) cross sectional study: the sample 1 includes the HCWs assessed at T2 (2020-2021); (2) longitudinal study: the sample 2 includes the HCWs assessed at both T1 (2015-2016) and T2 (2020-2021). The data collected included: sociodemographics, health status, professional variables, and psycho-comportemental aspects. QoL was assessed using WHOQOL-BREF which provides 4 scores. Results: In comparison with French norms, the physical and social scores of QoL were significantly lower while the psychological score was significantly higher for (i) the 223 HCWs (participation rate 62%) assessed at T2 and (ii) the 61 HCWs assessed at T1 and T2. The main factors modulating QoL were age, marital status, self-perceived financial difficulties, personal chronic disease, anxiety-mood disorders, nature of coping strategies, and burnout. Conclusion: This study confirms the mixed (negative and positive) impact of caring persons with PLH on the institutional HCWs' QOL. Main determinants of the HCW's QOL were: older age, single status, perceived financial difficulties, altered health status, burn out and coping strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.