ArticleACS omega2024
Characterization and Inversion Method of Relative Permeability of Emulsion Flooding.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Relative permeability curves are one of the crucial factors that control the behavior of multiphase flow in petroleum reservoirs. Accurate prediction of the relative permeability curve involving emulsification and emulsion transport in emulsion flooding is vital to enhancing heavy oil recovery. In this study, a relative permeability characterization model including the emulsification mechanism and emulsion transport is developed, in which residual oil saturation and end-point permeability for water are parametrized as functions of emulsion concentration and capillary number. Based on the built characterization model, an inversion method (ensemble Kalman filter) is used to estimate the relative permeability curves of emulsion flooding. The inversion results of four sets of emulsion flooding experiments show that the errors of end points between the Johnson-Bossler-Neumann method and inversion method are less than 10%. For the continuous emulsification process in the in situ emulsion flooding tests, the inversed relative permeability curves shift between the upper and the inferior limits of the permeability. The error of residual oil saturation between the inversion and the experiment is less than 10%. In summary, this study demonstrates the feasibility of using the characterization model and inversion method to infer the relative permeability curves of emulsion flooding, which can aid in the predictions of multiphase flow in heavy oil reservoirs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.