ArticleACS omega2024
Effect of Waste Glass Powder and Bamboo Fiber on the Physico-Mechanical Properties and High-Temperature Behavior of a Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the properties of fly ash-based geopolymers containing waste glass powder (WGP) and bamboo fiber (BF) after exposure to ambient and high temperatures. Precursor replacement of fly ash by WGP at 2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10% levels coupled with the addition of BF at 1, 1.5, 2, and 2.5% levels was used to enhance the reactivity and toughness of the geopolymer matrix. The impact of WGP and BF on the fluidity, setting time, density, water absorption, and compressive and flexural strengths of the geopolymer pastes was examined. The experimental results showed that the physical properties of the geopolymer were altered by adding WGP and BF. The optimal percentages of WGP replacement and BF addition were 5 and 2%, respectively. Additionally, tests such as thermogravimetric analysis, mass loss, thermal shrinkage, compressive and flexural tests, visual observation, optical microscope, scanning electron microscopy, and X-ray diffraction analysis were conducted to assess the behavior of the geopolymers after exposure to high temperatures (200-800 °C). Addition of WGP and BF led to higher residual strengths, demonstrating that the geopolymer composites tended to gradually densify with increasing temperature due to the pore-filling effects of WGP and the channel effects of BF, while the pure geopolymer continuously developed more cracks and wider pores. The study provides a viable approach for using solid waste materials and renewable resources in the production of high-performance geopolymer composites as sustainable building materials.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.