Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39493959›Full record

ArticleActa ortopedica brasileira2024

SMOKING AND MODIC CHANGES IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN: A COMPARATIVE STUDY.

Guilherme Augusto Foizer, Vagner Cleyton de Paiva, Carlos Gorios, Alberto Cliquet, João Batista de Miranda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta ortopedica brasileira, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Guilherme Augusto FoizerUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4255-8208
Vagner Cleyton de PaivaClínica Avançada de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7843-236X
Carlos GoriosCentro Universitário São Camilo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0840-124X
Alberto CliquetUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Departamento de Ortopedia, Reumatologia e Traumatologia, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9893-5204
João Batista de MirandaUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Departamento de Ortopedia, Reumatologia e Traumatologia, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9128-0295

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the prevalence of smokers among patients with chronic low back pain, in the presence and absence of Modic changes, also the correlation between smoking history and progression of the Modic scale.

methodsObservational study, case-control type, with the inclusion of 340 vertebral segments in a total of 68 patients, separated into groups: with Modic (case group) and without Modic (control group). The odds ratio between the groups was verified using the Chi-Square test. Degree of correlation between smoking history (packs/year) and the degree of disc degeneration using Max-Modic and Sum-Modic, using Spearman's non-parametric test.

resultsThe Modic group (MG) was 54% female and 46% male, with an average smoking history of 13.84 pack-years and an average of 1.42 altered segments per patient.

conclusionAn increased risk for Modic changes was found among smoking patients (odds ratio [OR] 4.09; 95% CI, 1.26-12.31; p < 0.01) and significant correlation between Max-Modic, sum-Modic and smoking history.

Indexed as

Intervertebral DiscIntervertebral Disc DegenerationLow Back PainMagnetic Resonance ImagingTobacco Smoking

Identifiers

PMID39493959
PMCPMC11530215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.