ArticleBrain & spine2024
Machine learning predictive model for lumbar disc reherniation following microsurgical discectomy.
Article in Brain & spine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Sequesterectomy versus standard micro‑/open discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Deep learning in neurosurgery: a systematic literature review with a structured analysis of applications across subspecialties.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The integration of machine learning (ML) algorithms into the field of neurosurgery has the potential to facilitate the decision-making process for the surgeons, improve the surgical outcomes and the overall patient satisfaction rates. Reoperations for same level lumbar disc reherniation are associated with poorer outcomes and greater rate of complications. Research question: Proper preoperative patient evaluation could reveal the individuals at higher risk of reherniation. A novel machine learning algorithm was used for the creation of a predictive scoring system for lumbar disc reherniation for patients requiring microdiscectomy without fusion. Material and methods: Retrospective chart review was completed of all adult patients that underwent microdiscectomy without fusion for symptomatic single level LDH, in a single center, over the last 3 years. 230 patients met the inclusion criteria. 19 of them required a second surgical intervention due to same level reherniation. Results: Utilizing the Risk-SLIM model, the Lumbar Reherniation Score (LRS) was created. The score's accuracy was tested against other model architectures, and a standard five-fold cross-validation was performed. The LRS has AUC of 0.87, confusion matrix accuracy of 0.74, Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.36 and informedness of 0.62. The LRS individual reherniation risk probability ranges from 0% to 88.1%. Discussion and conclusion: The LRS is a novel, easy-to-use, patient-specific tool for preoperative prediction of the individual patient-specific risk of same level symptomatic reherniation following microdiscectomy. Further validation and testing of the model is needed before it can be used in real-life patient treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.