Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39493947›Full record

ReviewUS cardiology2023

An Approach to Non-left Main Bifurcation Lesions: A Contemporary Review.

Ali Nazmi Calik, F Aaysha Cader, Erik Rafflenbeul, Sercan Okutucu, Saidur Rahman Khan, Ismail Polat Canbolat, Umit Yasar Sinan, Mirvat A Alasnag

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in US cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ali Nazmi CalikDepartment of Cardiology, University of Health Sciences, Dr Siyami Ersek Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital Istanbul, Turkey.
F Aaysha CaderDepartment of Cardiology, Ibrahim Cardiac Hospital & Research Institute Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Erik RafflenbeulDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Schön Klinik Hamburg Eilbek, Germany.
Sercan OkutucuDepartment of Cardiology, Memorial Hospital Ankara, Turkey.
Saidur Rahman KhanDepartment of Cardiology, Ibrahim Cardiac Hospital & Research Institute Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Ismail Polat CanbolatDepartment of Cardiology, Demiroglu Bilim University Istanbul, Turkey.
Umit Yasar SinanDepartment of Cardiology, Istanbul University - Cerrahpaşa, Institute of Cardiology Istanbul, Turkey.
Mirvat A AlasnagDepartment of Cardiology, King Fahd Armed Forces Hospital Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bifurcated anatomical locations in the arterial tree, such as coronary artery bifurcations, are prone to develop obstructive atherosclerotic lesions due to the pro-atherogenic low wall shear stress. The percutaneous treatment of bifurcation lesions is among the most challenging complex coronary interventions, including different multistep stenting strategies. Even though provisional side branch (SB) stenting is recommended as the primary approach in most cases, the debate continues between provisional SB and upfront two-stent strategies, particularly in complex bifurcations consisting of a significantly diseased SB that supplies a crucial myocardial territory. This review will highlight the importance of understanding the bifurcation philosophy and provide an individual algorithmic approach to find the optimal treatment strategy for each patient with a non-left main coronary bifurcation lesion. Considering the most recent scientific evidence, the advantages and disadvantages of each stenting technique and the role of intracoronary imaging to optimize bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes will be discussed.

Indexed as

Coronary bifurcationsstepwise provisional stentingsystematic two-stent strategy

Identifiers

PMID39493947
PMCPMC11526486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.