Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39493921›Full record

ArticleUltrasound (Leeds, England)2024

LogMyScan: A pilot evaluation study of a mobile phone-based ultrasound logbook application.

Robert David Jarman, David Anderson, Simon Richards, Tyrone Davison, Siobhan Fenton, Alan Batterham, Cormac Ryan, Philip Cosson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound (Leeds, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Robert David JarmanRoyal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4557-9274
David AndersonCumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Simon RichardsSchool of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9176-1267
Tyrone DavisonSchool of Computing, Engineering and Digital Technologies, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.
Siobhan FentonSchool of Computing, Engineering and Digital Technologies, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.
Alan BatterhamSchool of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.
Cormac RyanSchool of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5864-4325
Philip CossonSchool of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: We developed a mobile phone logbook application called LogMyScan. The study objectives were to evaluate a number of domains as per the technology acceptance model. Methods: A prospective pilot cohort study was conducted using a version of LogMyScan and reported according to Statement on Reporting of Evaluation studies in Health Informatics. Prospective participants were directed to a website which provided information and links. Participants were recruited via email distribution lists and social media. A task list was provided, which included entering simulated scan data and navigating the application, prior to completing a questionnaire. Questions were aligned to technology acceptance model domains, and Cronbach's alpha was calculated to assess reliability. Results: There were 49 participants and 7 were unable to complete the image upload and editing step. Levels of agreement for usability, educational and governance/security aspects were generally good. The desirability of existing and proposed features was high for images and video clip handling, feedback and reflection and less for motivational notifications and benchmarking. Comments identified some limitations and issues on the Android platform. Cronbach's alpha demonstrated good to excellent reliability: 0.87 (95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.91) for usability, educational and governance/security and 0.86 (95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.91) for desirability of existing and proposed features. Conclusion: There was generally high perceived ease of use, usefulness, attitude towards use and behavioural intention to use LogMyScan. Further research is needed to evaluate LogMyScan for future iterations, allowing recruitment of a larger number of participants and evaluating user expectations prior to using, and at timed intervals after using.

Indexed as

logbookmobile phone applicationpoint-of-care ultrasoundtrainingUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID39493921
PMCPMC11528807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.