Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39493913›Full record

ArticleHeart rhythm O22024

Remarkably high and accelerating failure rate of a widely used implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead: A large-scale manufacturer-independent multicenter study with long accurate follow-up.

Erik F J Oosterwerff, Dominic A M J Theuns, Alexander H Maass, Lieselot van Erven

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Erik F J OosterwerffDepartment of Cardiology, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Dominic A M J TheunsDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Alexander H MaassDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Lieselot van ErvenDepartment of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A high annual failure rate of the Linox family defibrillator lead was reported in various small single-center studies. No independent multicenter long-term performance information exists for this lead. Objective: Our aim was to assess the longevity of the Linox family leads and to evaluate clinical variables and adverse events associated with failure. Methods: This 4-center study included adults >18 years of age who received Linox family leads for the prevention of sudden cardiac death. From November 2006 to November 2016, a total of 3993 high-voltage leads of the Linox family were implanted and followed up on. Results: The absolute failure rate was 10.6% (dwell time to lead failure of 6.3 ± 3.4 years). Multivariate analysis confirmed younger age (for every 5 years younger than 65 years) (hazard ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.14, Conclusion: This is the largest physician-driven multicenter study on the very long-term performance of Linox family leads. Our data report a remarkably high failure rate of these leads. Our findings have significant implications for the management of patients. Monitoring by remote care should be available for all active Linox family leads.

Indexed as

Failure rateICDImplantable cardioverter-defibrillatorLead failureLinoxLong-term performance

Identifiers

PMID39493913
PMCPMC11524969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.