Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39493710›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Promoting resilience among medical students using the Wadi framework: a clinical teacher's perspective.

Ali Ibrahim Shorbagi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ali Ibrahim ShorbagiDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resilience is essential for medical students to navigate the challenges of their education and future careers. Defined as the ability to adapt well in the face of adversity, resilience can be learned and is critical for maintaining mental health. Medical educators play a pivotal role in fostering resilience by integrating it into both formal and informal curricula, including the hidden curriculum, which can significantly influence students' coping strategies. Research highlights the importance of resilience training in reducing depression and anxiety among students, underscoring its necessity as a core component of medical education. This essay presents the Systematic Assessment for Resilience (SAR) framework, which provides a comprehensive approach to promoting resilience through four key constructs: self-control, management, engagement, and growth. Practical strategies for each construct are discussed, including assessment mapping, time management, and the use of formative assessments to enhance students' preparedness and self-control. Engagement is fostered through collaborative assessments, open book exams, and regular formative feedback, while growth is encouraged via self-reflection and faculty development. Implementing the SAR framework has shown positive outcomes, with students reporting reduced anxiety and improved performance. However, further exploration and institutional support are needed to fully integrate these strategies into medical education. The SAR framework offers a feasible and effective method for cultivating resilience, contributing to students' mental well-being and equipping them to face future challenges in their medical careers. Continued refinement and broader institutional adoption will be crucial to sustaining the impact of resilience training in medical education.

Indexed as

health professions educationresilienceSAR frameworkstudent wellbeingtest anxiety

Identifiers

PMID39493710
PMCPMC11527645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.