Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39493640›Full record

ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2023

Parameter Selection for Convex Optimization Time Calibration for a 2-Panel PET System.

Gregory Romanchek, Shiva Abbaszadeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gregory RomanchekDept. of Nuclear, Plasma, and Radiological Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61891, USA.
Shiva AbbaszadehDept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.

Funding

High spatial resolution dedicated head and neck PET system based on cadmium zinc telluride detectorsR01EB028091 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI ABBASZADEH, SHIVA · 2018 to 2021
$2.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB028091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coincidence timing calibration is fundamental to PET imaging. The electronics, cable lengths, and detector physics such as charge drift and depth dependence add to the measured time differences in coincidence sorting - increasing random rate, decreasing true rate, and degrading system performance. This work investigates the parameter selection for convex optimization (Ordinary Least Squares) for timing calibration. We test the correlation between commonly selected parameters and the experimentally measured coincidence time difference. Additionally, we test 127 nested models of a parameterized regression equation to identify the those which optimize MSE, BIC, and FWHM, respectively. In each of these models, the FWHM performance improved ~53%, though the value shifted from ~ 304 to 160 ns - far from ~ 10 ns FWHM CZT can achieve. The results point to the lack of a necessary parameter, such as trigger threshold level or temperature, or data which is too variable for the OLS optimization.

Indexed as

convex optimizationparameter selectionPETtime calibrationtime resolution

Identifiers

PMID39493640
PMCPMC11530712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.